Agent Skills
Plan Generator
AIPOCH
Automatically generates a Markdown final-exam review plan or lab experiment schedule when you provide a date range, tasks/items, and available daily hours (via interactive prompts or a one-time JSON input).
2
0
FILES
90100Total Score
View Evaluation ReportCore Capability
83 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
13 / 16
Human Usability
7 / 8
Security
9 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
99You need a final exam review plan across a specific start/end date range
4/4
95You need a lab experiment schedule that allocates tasks by duration within a time window
4/4
93Supports two plan types:
4/4
93Review plan (course/exam-oriented)
4/4
93End-to-end case for Supports two plan types:
4/4
SKILL.md
Validation Shortcut
Run this minimal command first to verify the supported execution path:
python scripts/plan_generator.py --help
When to Use
- You need a final exam review plan across a specific start/end date range.
- You need a lab experiment schedule that allocates tasks by duration within a time window.
- You want to generate a calendar-style day-by-day plan and export it as Markdown.
- You need to account for task dependencies (e.g., Experiment B after Experiment A).
- You need to consider resource constraints for lab work (e.g., shared instruments).
Key Features
- Supports two plan types:
- Review plan (course/exam-oriented)
- Lab schedule (task/dependency/resource-oriented)
- Two input modes:
- Interactive step-by-step prompts
- One-time JSON submission
- Produces a Markdown output containing:
- Plan summary
- Day-by-day schedule
- Task/item list
- Offline and local-only execution:
- No network access
- Reads only a user-specified JSON file (if provided)
- Writes output to the current working directory
Dependencies
- Python 3.x
- Python Standard Library only (no third-party packages)
Example Usage
1) Interactive mode
python scripts/plan_generator.py
Follow the prompts to provide:
plan_type(revieworlab)start_date,end_date(YYYY-MM-DD)items(tasks/courses/experiments)daily_hours(available hours per day; may differ for weekdays vs weekends)
2) One-time JSON input mode
Create an input file (e.g., input.json) and run:
python scripts/plan_generator.py --json input.json
Example: Review plan JSON
{
"plan_type": "review",
"start_date": "2026-06-01",
"end_date": "2026-06-14",
"daily_hours": {
"weekday": 3,
"weekend": 5
},
"items": [
{
"name": "Linear Algebra",
"exam_date": "2026-06-15",
"importance": 1,
"topics": ["Vectors", "Matrices", "Eigenvalues"]
},
{
"name": "Operating Systems",
"exam_date": "2026-06-18",
"importance": 2,
"topics": ["Processes", "Scheduling", "Memory"]
}
]
}
Example: Lab schedule JSON
{
"plan_type": "lab",
"start_date": "2026-03-01",
"end_date": "2026-03-07",
"daily_hours": {
"weekday": 6,
"weekend": 4
},
"items": [
{
"name": "Experiment A",
"duration_hours": 6,
"dependencies": [],
"resources": ["Centrifuge"]
},
{
"name": "Experiment B",
"duration_hours": 4,
"dependencies": ["Experiment A"],
"resources": ["PCR Machine"]
}
]
}
Implementation Details
-
Plan types
review: Items represent courses/exams. Each item may include:exam_date(YYYY-MM-DD)importance(integer priority/weight)topics(list of strings)
lab: Items represent experiments/tasks. Each item may include:duration_hours(numeric)dependencies(list of prerequisite item names)resources(list of required instruments/resources)
-
Scheduling window
- The schedule is generated only within
[start_date, end_date](inclusive). - Daily capacity is derived from
daily_hours(e.g., weekday vs weekend).
- The schedule is generated only within
-
Constraints and assumptions
- Lab items may be ordered/placed to respect
dependencies(a dependent task should not be scheduled before its prerequisites). - Resource fields are included to support resource-aware planning; the schedule output records resource needs alongside tasks.
- Lab items may be ordered/placed to respect
-
I/O and safety
- The script does not access the network.
- It reads only the JSON file path explicitly provided by the user (when using
--json). - It writes the generated Markdown plan to the current directory.
- It does not store or emit sensitive personal data beyond what the user provides in the input.
When Not to Use
- Do not use this skill when the required source data, identifiers, files, or credentials are missing.
- Do not use this skill when the user asks for fabricated results, unsupported claims, or out-of-scope conclusions.
- Do not use this skill when a simpler direct answer is more appropriate than the documented workflow.
Required Inputs
- A clearly specified task goal aligned with the documented scope.
- All required files, identifiers, parameters, or environment variables before execution.
- Any domain constraints, formatting requirements, and expected output destination if applicable.
Recommended Workflow
- Validate the request against the skill boundary and confirm all required inputs are present.
- Select the documented execution path and prefer the simplest supported command or procedure.
- Produce the expected output using the documented file format, schema, or narrative structure.
- Run a final validation pass for completeness, consistency, and safety before returning the result.
Output Contract
- Return a structured deliverable that is directly usable without reformatting.
- If a file is produced, prefer a deterministic output name such as
plan_generator_result.mdunless the skill documentation defines a better convention. - Include a short validation summary describing what was checked, what assumptions were made, and any remaining limitations.
Validation and Safety Rules
- Validate required inputs before execution and stop early when mandatory fields or files are missing.
- Do not fabricate measurements, references, findings, or conclusions that are not supported by the provided source material.
- Emit a clear warning when credentials, privacy constraints, safety boundaries, or unsupported requests affect the result.
- Keep the output safe, reproducible, and within the documented scope at all times.
Failure Handling
- If validation fails, explain the exact missing field, file, or parameter and show the minimum fix required.
- If an external dependency or script fails, surface the command path, likely cause, and the next recovery step.
- If partial output is returned, label it clearly and identify which checks could not be completed.
Quick Validation
Run this minimal verification path before full execution when possible:
python scripts/plan_generator.py --help
Expected output format:
Result file: plan_generator_result.md
Validation summary: PASS/FAIL with brief notes
Assumptions: explicit list if any
Deterministic Output Rules
- Use the same section order for every supported request of this skill.
- Keep output field names stable and do not rename documented keys across examples.
- If a value is unavailable, emit an explicit placeholder instead of omitting the field.
Completion Checklist
- Confirm all required inputs were present and valid.
- Confirm the supported execution path completed without unresolved errors.
- Confirm the final deliverable matches the documented format exactly.
- Confirm assumptions, limitations, and warnings are surfaced explicitly.