arboreto
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The legacy review kept arboreto tied to supported scientific content rather than invented findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package remained focused on source handling, lookup, or structured evidence use. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The archived review found the package methodologically anchored to a named assessment rule set. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The archived review found the packaged execution path for arboreto usable in its intended context. |
Core Capability85 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 85 / 100 — Assertions: 15/20 Passed
This canonical case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
The preserved weakness for You have single-cell RNA-seq data (after normalization/aggregation as needed) and want to recover putative regulatory interactions was concentrated in one point: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
The main issue in this edge run was: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
This variant b case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 85/100 and dynamic average is 73.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 0/1; adjustment=0. infer_network.py: rc=1