Academic Writing

biomed-outline-generator

90100Total Score

Core Capability

82 / 100

Functional Suitability

11 / 12

Reliability

10 / 12

Performance & Context

8 / 8

Agent Usability

13 / 16

Human Usability

6 / 8

Security

9 / 12

Maintainability

9 / 12

Agent-Specific

16 / 20

Medical Task

20 / 20 Passed

100You provide research directions, keywords, or a brief topic description and want a review article outline

4/4

96You paste Results/Discussion paragraphs (data descriptions, observations, statistics) and want a paper discussion outline

4/4

94Validate domain and sufficiency

4/4

94Build the section skeleton

4/4

94Final safety and writing pass

4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed

✓

Operational Stability

System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases

PASS

✓

Structural Consistency

Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format

PASS

✓

Result Determinism

Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs

PASS

✓

System Security

No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected

PASS

Research Veto✅ PASS — Applicable

Dimension	Result	Detail
Scientific Integrity	PASS	The archived evaluation preserved source-faithful writing behavior without adding unsupported results or conclusions.
Practice Boundaries	PASS	Practice boundaries held because the package kept to Generates structured biomedical outlines for review articles, discussion sections, and... instead of claiming new evidence.
Methodological Ground	PASS	The older review treated the package logic as methodologically aligned with its stated workflow.
Code Usability	N/A	The core deliverable is textual rather than executable, which makes code usability not applicable in this case.

Core Capability82 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability

Functional fit remained strong, though the final communication package could still be a little tighter.

11 / 12

92%

Reliability

The package stayed usable overall, although more consistent behavior across edge dissemination cases would help.

10 / 12

83%

Performance & Context

Performance context reached full score in the archived evaluation.

8 / 8

100%

Agent Usability

The archived score suggests slightly clearer routing would help an agent choose the right dissemination path faster.

13 / 16

81%

Human Usability

Related legacy finding for biomed-outline-generator: Minor polish before wide rollout. No major defects found

6 / 8

75%

Security

Security scored well, though the archived review still left some room to state source-faithful boundaries more explicitly.

9 / 12

75%

Maintainability

Maintainability stayed solid, with modest room to simplify or consolidate the conversion workflow.

9 / 12

75%

Agent-Specific

The package is strongly agent-oriented, with only modest headroom in routing precision and edge-case handling.

16 / 20

80%

Core Capability Total82 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 95.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

100

Canonical

You provide research directions, keywords, or a brief topic description and want a review article outline

4/4 ✓

Variant A

You paste Results/Discussion paragraphs (data descriptions, observations, statistics) and want a paper discussion outline

4/4 ✓

Edge

Validate domain and sufficiency

4/4 ✓

Variant B

Build the section skeleton

4/4 ✓

Stress

Final safety and writing pass

4/4 ✓

100

Canonical✅ Pass

You provide research directions, keywords, or a brief topic description and want a review article outline

For You provide research directions, keywords, or a brief topic..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 37/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 100/100

✅A1The biomed-outline-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Variant A✅ Pass

You paste Results/Discussion paragraphs (data descriptions, observations, statistics) and want a paper discussion outline

For You paste Results/Discussion paragraphs (data descriptions,..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 35/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 96/100

✅A1The biomed-outline-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Edge✅ Pass

Validate domain and sufficiency

The Validate domain and sufficiency path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 94/100

✅A1The biomed-outline-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Variant B✅ Pass

Build the section skeleton

The archived run for Build the section skeleton confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.

Basic 33/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 94/100

✅A1The biomed-outline-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Stress✅ Pass

Final safety and writing pass

For Final safety and writing pass, the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 30/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 94/100

✅A1The biomed-outline-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable

✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case

✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary

✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Medical Task Total95.6 / 100

Key Strengths

Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
Static quality score is 82/100 and dynamic average is 82.6/100
Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/1; adjustment=5. validate_skill.py: OK