biopython-phylo
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific integrity held because extraction and analysis outputs stayed tied to provided text, metadata, or runtime evidence rather than invented study findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The archived review kept this package within Use Bio.Phylo to read/write phylogenetic trees and perform visualization and statistics, not freeform inference detached from source data. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy review kept the package aligned with its named analysis library, data structure, or processing workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy audit did not record a code-usability failure in the packaged analysis path. |
Core Capability84 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 86.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
This canonical case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.
Traversing a tree to locate clades, prune taxa, or reroot at a... remained tied to the documented analysis contract even when the preserved evidence centered on instructions instead of a full rerun.
Read and write phylogenetic trees via Bio.Phylo with support for... remained tied to the documented analysis contract even when the preserved evidence centered on instructions instead of a full rerun.
Tree manipulation utilities: traversal, clade selection, pruning,... remained tied to the documented analysis contract even when the preserved evidence centered on instructions instead of a full rerun.
The archived run treated End-to-end case for Read and write phylogenetic trees via Bio.Phylo... as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode A
- Static quality score is 84/100 and dynamic average is 78.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: No script verification was applicable