citation-chasing-mapping
Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping research lineage and intellectual heritage, discovering related work through reference tracking, or finding potential collaborators through co-citation analysis. Maps citation networks to trace research evolution, identify influential papers, and discover hidden connections in scientific literature. Supports systematic reviews, bibliometric analysis, and research planning through comprehensive citation tracking.
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived evaluation kept the skill tied to retrieved records or indexed source material rather than invented scientific claims. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | No methodological-grounding issue was recorded for citation-chasing-mapping in the archived evaluation. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy evaluation did not preserve a usability failure in the packaged retrieval path. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
The Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping... scenario completed within the documented Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping research lineage and... boundary.
Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The archived run for Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review