Evidence Insight

citation-chasing-mapping

85100Total Score
Core Capability
88 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
18 / 20 Passed
90Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping research lineage and intellectual heritage, discovering related work through reference tracking, or finding potential collaborators through co-citation analysis. Maps citation networks to trace research evolution, identify influential papers, and discover hidden connections in scientific literature. Supports systematic reviews, bibliometric analysis, and research planning through comprehensive citation tracking
4/4
86Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
4/4
84Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping research lineage and intellectual heritage, discovering related work through reference tracking, or finding potential collaborators through co-citation analysis. Maps citation networks to trace research evolution, identify influential papers, and discover hidden connections in scientific literature. Supports systematic reviews, bibliometric analysis, and research planning through comprehensive citation tracking
4/4
82Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
4/4
76End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping research lineage and intellectual heritage, discovering related work through reference tracking, or finding potential collaborators through co-citation analysis. Maps citation networks to trace research evolution, identify influential papers, and discover hidden connections in scientific literature. Supports systematic reviews, bibliometric analysis, and research planning through comprehensive citation tracking
2/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS
Research Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
DimensionResultDetail
Scientific IntegrityPASSThe archived evaluation kept the skill tied to retrieved records or indexed source material rather than invented scientific claims.
Practice BoundariesPASSThe package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation.
Methodological GroundPASSNo methodological-grounding issue was recorded for citation-chasing-mapping in the archived evaluation.
Code UsabilityPASSThe legacy evaluation did not preserve a usability failure in the packaged retrieval path.

Core Capability88 / 1008 Categories

Functional Suitability
A modest deduction remained in functional suitability for citation-chasing-mapping in the archived review.
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
The archived deduction in reliability traces back to: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
No point loss was recorded for performance context in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The legacy audit deducted points for citation-chasing-mapping in agent usability.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
Human usability reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Security
A modest deduction remained in security for citation-chasing-mapping in the archived review.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
A modest deduction remained in maintainability for citation-chasing-mapping in the archived review.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
Related legacy finding for citation-chasing-mapping: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total88 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed

90
Canonical
Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping research lineage and intellectual heritage, discovering related work through reference tracking, or finding potential collaborators through co-citation analysis. Maps citation networks to trace research evolution, identify influential papers, and discover hidden connections in scientific literature. Supports systematic reviews, bibliometric analysis, and research planning through comprehensive citation tracking
4/4
86
Variant A
Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
4/4
84
Edge
Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping research lineage and intellectual heritage, discovering related work through reference tracking, or finding potential collaborators through co-citation analysis. Maps citation networks to trace research evolution, identify influential papers, and discover hidden connections in scientific literature. Supports systematic reviews, bibliometric analysis, and research planning through comprehensive citation tracking
4/4
82
Variant B
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
4/4
76
Stress
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping research lineage and intellectual heritage, discovering related work through reference tracking, or finding potential collaborators through co-citation analysis. Maps citation networks to trace research evolution, identify influential papers, and discover hidden connections in scientific literature. Supports systematic reviews, bibliometric analysis, and research planning through comprehensive citation tracking
2/4
90
Canonical✅ Pass
Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping research lineage and intellectual heritage, discovering related work through reference tracking, or finding potential collaborators through co-citation analysis. Maps citation networks to trace research evolution, identify influential papers, and discover hidden connections in scientific literature. Supports systematic reviews, bibliometric analysis, and research planning through comprehensive citation tracking

The Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping... scenario completed within the documented Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping research lineage and... boundary.

Basic 38/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 90/100
A1The citation-chasing-mapping output structure covers required deliverable blocks
A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format

Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 50/60|Total 86/100
A1The citation-chasing-mapping output structure covers required deliverable blocks
A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
84
Edge✅ Pass
Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping research lineage and intellectual heritage, discovering related work through reference tracking, or finding potential collaborators through co-citation analysis. Maps citation networks to trace research evolution, identify influential papers, and discover hidden connections in scientific literature. Supports systematic reviews, bibliometric analysis, and research planning through comprehensive citation tracking

The archived run for Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.

Basic 35/40|Specialized 49/60|Total 84/100
A1The citation-chasing-mapping output structure covers required deliverable blocks
A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
82
Variant B✅ Pass
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py

Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 48/60|Total 82/100
A1The citation-chasing-mapping output structure covers required deliverable blocks
A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
76
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use when identifying seminal papers in a research field, mapping research lineage and intellectual heritage, discovering related work through reference tracking, or finding potential collaborators through co-citation analysis. Maps citation networks to trace research evolution, identify influential papers, and discover hidden connections in scientific literature. Supports systematic reviews, bibliometric analysis, and research planning through comprehensive citation tracking

This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.

Basic 31/40|Specialized 45/60|Total 76/100
A1The citation-chasing-mapping output structure covers required deliverable blocks
A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 2 / 4
Medical Task Total83.6 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
  • Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review