Data Analysis
cohort-study-quality-assessment-nos
Evaluates the quality of cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Use when the user provides a cohort study article or text and needs a quality assessment report.
87100Total Score
Core Capability
88 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
15 / 20 Passed
86Evaluates the quality of cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS)
3/4
86Step 2: Analyze the Text
3/4
86Step 2: Analyze the Text
3/4
86Step 4: Calculate Score and Generate Report
3/4
86Step 5: Generate Final Report
3/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived review kept this workflow anchored to supplied data fields and observable execution behavior, not fabricated results. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package remained focused on Evaluates the quality of cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) rather than overclaiming what the records supported. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The workflow stayed grounded in its declared rubric or scale-selection logic rather than improvised criteria. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The archived review found the packaged execution path for cohort-study-quality-assessment-nos usable in its intended context. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
Functional suitability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Related legacy finding for cohort-study-quality-assessment-nos: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
No point loss was recorded for performance context in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
Agent usability was strong, but the workflow could surface its entry conditions a little more directly.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
No point loss was recorded for human usability in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Security
Security remained strong, though the archived review still left some room for clearer execution guardrails.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
Maintainability stayed solid, with only limited room to simplify scripts, dependencies, or packaging structure.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
The archived deduction in agent specific traces back to: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total88 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 86 / 100 — Assertions: 15/20 Passed
86
Canonical
Evaluates the quality of cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS)
3/4 ✓
86
Variant A
Step 2: Analyze the Text
3/4 ✓
86
Edge
Step 2: Analyze the Text
3/4 ✓
86
Variant B
Step 4: Calculate Score and Generate Report
3/4 ✓
86
Stress
Step 5: Generate Final Report
3/4 ✓
86
Canonical✅ Pass
Evaluates the quality of cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS)
The archived execution for Evaluates the quality of cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa... failed for environmental reasons rather than workflow ambiguity: a required file was missing.
Basic 33/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The cohort-study-quality-assessment-nos output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
Step 2: Analyze the Text
The Step 2: Analyze the Text workflow is defined, but this run was blocked by a missing local input file.
Basic 31/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The cohort-study-quality-assessment-nos output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Edge✅ Pass
Step 2: Analyze the Text
Step 2: Analyze the Text stayed well-scoped, but the local run could not proceed because the expected input file was absent.
Basic 30/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The cohort-study-quality-assessment-nos output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Variant B✅ Pass
Step 4: Calculate Score and Generate Report
The Step 4: Calculate Score and Generate Report workflow is defined, but this run was blocked by a missing local input file.
Basic 29/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The cohort-study-quality-assessment-nos output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Stress✅ Pass
Step 5: Generate Final Report
Step 5: Generate Final Report stayed well-scoped, but the local run could not proceed because the expected input file was absent.
Basic 26/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The cohort-study-quality-assessment-nos output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
Medical Task Total86 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 72.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 0/2; adjustment=0. calculate_nos_score.py: rc=1; extract_pdf.py: rc=1