Evidence Insight
comparison-table-gen
85100Total Score
Core Capability
88 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
18 / 20 Passed
90Auto-generates comparison tables for concepts, drugs, or study results
4/4
86Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
4/4
84Auto-generates comparison tables for concepts, drugs, or study results
4/4
82Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
4/4
76End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Auto-generates comparison tables for concepts, drugs, or study results
2/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific integrity held because the package framed recommendations as plans to be tested, not facts already established. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package remained focused on source handling, lookup, or structured evidence use. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Auto-generates comparison tables for concepts, drugs, or study results workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy audit did not flag code-usability issues for the packaged comparison-table-gen workflow. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
A modest deduction remained in functional suitability for comparison-table-gen in the archived review.
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Reliability was softened by the legacy issue 'Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior'. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
The legacy audit gave full marks to performance context for this package.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
A modest deduction remained in agent usability for comparison-table-gen in the archived review.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
The legacy audit gave full marks to human usability for this package.
8 / 8
100%
Security
A modest deduction remained in security for comparison-table-gen in the archived review.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for comparison-table-gen under maintainability.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
Related legacy finding for comparison-table-gen: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total88 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
90
Canonical
Auto-generates comparison tables for concepts, drugs, or study results
4/4 ✓
86
Variant A
Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
4/4 ✓
84
Edge
Auto-generates comparison tables for concepts, drugs, or study results
4/4 ✓
82
Variant B
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
4/4 ✓
76
Stress
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Auto-generates comparison tables for concepts, drugs, or study results
2/4 ✓
90
Canonical✅ Pass
Auto-generates comparison tables for concepts, drugs, or study results
Auto-generates comparison tables for concepts, drugs, or study results remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
Basic 38/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 90/100
✅A1The comparison-table-gen output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
The Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented Auto-generates comparison tables for concepts, drugs, or study results boundary.
Basic 36/40|Specialized 50/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The comparison-table-gen output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
84
Edge✅ Pass
Auto-generates comparison tables for concepts, drugs, or study results
The archived run for Auto-generates comparison tables for concepts, drugs, or study results confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
Basic 35/40|Specialized 49/60|Total 84/100
✅A1The comparison-table-gen output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
82
Variant B✅ Pass
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
The archived evaluation treated Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py as a clean in-scope run.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 48/60|Total 82/100
✅A1The comparison-table-gen output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
76
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Auto-generates comparison tables for concepts, drugs, or study results
The preserved weakness for End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Auto-generates comparison tables for concepts, drugs, or study results was concentrated in one point: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Basic 31/40|Specialized 45/60|Total 76/100
✅A1The comparison-table-gen output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
❌A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
❌A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 2 / 4
Medical Task Total83.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review