Evidence Insight
crossref-database
91100Total Score
Core Capability
83 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
13 / 16
Human Usability
7 / 8
Security
9 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
100You have a DOI and need authoritative bibliographic metadata (title, authors, venue, publication date)
4/4
97You need to search CrossRef by keywords (title/author/topic) to find candidate works and their DOIs
4/4
95DOI Resolution: Resolve a DOI to CrossRef metadata and canonical URLs
4/4
94Work Search: Query CrossRef by free-text keywords (e.g., title, author, subject)
4/4
94End-to-end case for DOI Resolution: Resolve a DOI to CrossRef metadata and canonical URLs
4/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The legacy audit did not indicate that retrieval outputs were presented as unsupported findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package remained focused on source handling, lookup, or structured evidence use. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | No methodological-grounding issue was recorded for crossref-database in the archived evaluation. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The packaged retrieval surface remained understandable at the command and parameter level in the archived review. |
Core Capability83 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
The legacy audit deducted points for crossref-database in functional suitability.
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
A modest deduction remained in reliability for crossref-database in the archived review.
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
Performance context reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for crossref-database under agent usability.
13 / 16
81%
Human Usability
Related legacy finding for crossref-database: Minor polish before wide rollout. No major defects found
7 / 8
88%
Security
The archived evaluation left some headroom for crossref-database under security.
9 / 12
75%
Maintainability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for crossref-database under maintainability.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
The archived evaluation left some headroom for crossref-database under agent specific.
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total83 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 96 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
100
Canonical
You have a DOI and need authoritative bibliographic metadata (title, authors, venue, publication date)
4/4 ✓
97
Variant A
You need to search CrossRef by keywords (title/author/topic) to find candidate works and their DOIs
4/4 ✓
95
Edge
DOI Resolution: Resolve a DOI to CrossRef metadata and canonical URLs
4/4 ✓
94
Variant B
Work Search: Query CrossRef by free-text keywords (e.g., title, author, subject)
4/4 ✓
94
Stress
End-to-end case for DOI Resolution: Resolve a DOI to CrossRef metadata and canonical URLs
4/4 ✓
100
Canonical✅ Pass
You have a DOI and need authoritative bibliographic metadata (title, authors, venue, publication date)
For You have a DOI and need authoritative bibliographic metadata..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
Basic 38/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 100/100
✅A1The crossref-database output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
97
Variant A✅ Pass
You need to search CrossRef by keywords (title/author/topic) to find candidate works and their DOIs
The archived run for You need to search CrossRef by keywords (title/author/topic) to... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
Basic 36/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 97/100
✅A1The crossref-database output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
95
Edge✅ Pass
DOI Resolution: Resolve a DOI to CrossRef metadata and canonical URLs
The DOI Resolution: Resolve a DOI to CrossRef metadata and canonical URLs path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.
Basic 35/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 95/100
✅A1The crossref-database output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
94
Variant B✅ Pass
Work Search: Query CrossRef by free-text keywords (e.g., title, author, subject)
The archived run for Work Search: Query CrossRef by free-text keywords (e.g., title,... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 94/100
✅A1The crossref-database output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
94
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for DOI Resolution: Resolve a DOI to CrossRef metadata and canonical URLs
The End-to-end case for DOI Resolution: Resolve a DOI to CrossRef... path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.
Basic 31/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 94/100
✅A1The crossref-database output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total96 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 2/2; adjustment=5. query_crossref.py: OK; validate_skill.py: OK