diffdock-molecular-docking
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The legacy review kept diffdock-molecular-docking tied to supported scientific content rather than invented findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The archived evaluation treated the workflow as method-linked rather than ad hoc. |
| Code Usability | PASS | Code usability passed because the package still exposed a reviewable execution surface for its documented workflow. |
Core Capability85 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 85.2 / 100 — Assertions: 15/20 Passed
The archived evidence for Blind docking when you have a protein structure (PDB) and a ligand... shows a real execution snag, though not one that erased the workflow contract.
Pose prediction to generate multiple plausible 3D binding... kept a coherent task boundary even though the preserved run encountered a recoverable error.
The archived evidence for Diffusion generative sampling to produce diverse ligand binding poses shows a real execution snag, though not one that erased the workflow contract.
Confidence model scoring to rank predicted poses kept a coherent task boundary even though the preserved run encountered a recoverable error.
End-to-end case for Diffusion generative sampling to produce... kept a coherent task boundary even though the preserved run encountered a recoverable error.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 85/100 and dynamic average is 73.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/2; adjustment=3. inference_runner.py: OK; setup_check.py: rc=1