dnanexus-integration
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived review kept this workflow anchored to supplied data fields and observable execution behavior, not fabricated results. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The evaluated outputs stayed inside the DNAnexus cloud genomics platform. Build apps/applets, manage data (upload/download), dxpy... and did not drift into unsupported interpretation beyond the available inputs. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy review kept the package aligned with its named analysis library, data structure, or processing workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy audit did not record a code-usability failure in the packaged analysis path. |
Core Capability83 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 86.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
DNAnexus cloud genomics platform. Build apps/applets, manage data... remained tied to the documented analysis contract even when the preserved evidence centered on instructions instead of a full rerun.
The archived run treated DNAnexus cloud genomics platform. Build apps/applets, manage data... as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.
This edge case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.
The archived run treated Documentation-first workflow with no packaged script requirement as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.
The archived run treated DNAnexus cloud genomics platform. Build apps/applets, manage data (upload/download), dxpy... as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode A
- Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 78.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: No script verification was applicable