Evidence Insight
ena-database
86100Total Score
Core Capability
84 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
9 / 12
Performance & Context
7 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
92Access the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) via REST APIs and FTP/Aspera to search and retrieve sequences, raw reads (FASTQ), assemblies, and metadata when you have accession IDs or need metadata-driven discovery for genomics pipelines
4/4
88Access the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) via REST APIs and FTP/Aspera to search and retrieve sequences, raw reads (FASTQ), assemblies, and metadata when you have accession IDs or need metadata-driven discovery for genomics pipelines
4/4
86Multi-object ENA coverage: studies/projects, samples, experiments, runs, assemblies, sequences, analyses, taxonomy records
4/4
86Two primary API styles:
4/4
86End-to-end case for Multi-object ENA coverage: studies/projects, samples, experiments, runs, assemblies, sequences, analyses, taxonomy records
4/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific content remained anchored to fetched metadata or source-linked evidence in the legacy review. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The older review treated the package logic as methodologically aligned with its stated workflow. |
| Code Usability | N/A | The audited artifact centers on document or reasoning outputs, so code usability is not the main evaluation target here. |
Core Capability84 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
Functional suitability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Related legacy finding for ena-database: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
9 / 12
75%
Performance & Context
The legacy audit deducted points for ena-database in performance context.
7 / 8
88%
Agent Usability
The legacy audit deducted points for ena-database in agent usability.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
Human usability reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The archived evaluation left some headroom for ena-database under security.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
A modest deduction remained in maintainability for ena-database in the archived review.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
Agent specific was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total84 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 87.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
92
Canonical
Access the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) via REST APIs and FTP/Aspera to search and retrieve sequences, raw reads (FASTQ), assemblies, and metadata when you have accession IDs or need metadata-driven discovery for genomics pipelines
4/4 ✓
88
Variant A
Access the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) via REST APIs and FTP/Aspera to search and retrieve sequences, raw reads (FASTQ), assemblies, and metadata when you have accession IDs or need metadata-driven discovery for genomics pipelines
4/4 ✓
86
Edge
Multi-object ENA coverage: studies/projects, samples, experiments, runs, assemblies, sequences, analyses, taxonomy records
4/4 ✓
86
Variant B
Two primary API styles:
4/4 ✓
86
Stress
End-to-end case for Multi-object ENA coverage: studies/projects, samples, experiments, runs, assemblies, sequences, analyses, taxonomy records
4/4 ✓
92
Canonical✅ Pass
Access the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) via REST APIs and FTP/Aspera to search and retrieve sequences, raw reads (FASTQ), assemblies, and metadata when you have accession IDs or need metadata-driven discovery for genomics pipelines
This canonical case stayed inside the documented workflow and remained instruction-led.
Basic 36/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 92/100
✅A1The ena-database output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
88
Variant A✅ Pass
Access the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) via REST APIs and FTP/Aspera to search and retrieve sequences, raw reads (FASTQ), assemblies, and metadata when you have accession IDs or need metadata-driven discovery for genomics pipelines
This variant a case stayed inside the documented workflow and remained instruction-led.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 88/100
✅A1The ena-database output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Edge✅ Pass
Multi-object ENA coverage: studies/projects, samples, experiments, runs, assemblies, sequences, analyses, taxonomy records
Multi-object ENA coverage: studies/projects, samples, experiments,... was evaluated as a bounded documentation path, not as a runnable script workflow.
Basic 33/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The ena-database output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant B✅ Pass
Two primary API styles:
Two primary API styles: was evaluated as a bounded documentation path, not as a runnable script workflow.
Basic 32/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The ena-database output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Multi-object ENA coverage: studies/projects, samples, experiments, runs, assemblies, sequences, analyses, taxonomy records
This stress case stayed inside the documented workflow and remained instruction-led.
Basic 29/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The ena-database output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total87.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode A
- Static quality score is 84/100 and dynamic average is 79.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: No script verification was applicable