Other

expert-interview-generator

92100Total Score
Core Capability
88 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
99Generates a full expert interview article including introduction, Q&A body, and summary based on interview questions and expert background
4/4
95Step 2: Generate Q&A Body
4/4
93Step 2: Generate Q&A Body
4/4
93Step 1: Generate Expert Introduction
4/4
93Step 5: Final Assembly
4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS

Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability
Functional suitability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Related legacy finding for expert-interview-generator: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
No point loss was recorded for performance context in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The legacy audit deducted points for expert-interview-generator in agent usability.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
No point loss was recorded for human usability in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The archived evaluation left some headroom for expert-interview-generator under security.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
A modest deduction remained in maintainability for expert-interview-generator in the archived review.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
Agent specific was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total88 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 94.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

99
Canonical
Generates a full expert interview article including introduction, Q&A body, and summary based on interview questions and expert background
4/4 ✓
95
Variant A
Step 2: Generate Q&A Body
4/4 ✓
93
Edge
Step 2: Generate Q&A Body
4/4 ✓
93
Variant B
Step 1: Generate Expert Introduction
4/4 ✓
93
Stress
Step 5: Final Assembly
4/4 ✓
99
Canonical✅ Pass
Generates a full expert interview article including introduction, Q&A body, and summary based on interview questions and expert background

For Generates a full expert interview article including introduction,..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 38/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 99/100
✅A1The expert-interview-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
95
Variant A✅ Pass
Step 2: Generate Q&A Body

The archived run for Step 2: Generate Q&A Body confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 59/60|Total 95/100
✅A1The expert-interview-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
93
Edge✅ Pass
Step 2: Generate Q&A Body

The archived run for Step 2: Generate Q&A Body confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.

Basic 35/40|Specialized 58/60|Total 93/100
✅A1The expert-interview-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
93
Variant B✅ Pass
Step 1: Generate Expert Introduction

For Step 1: Generate Expert Introduction, the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 59/60|Total 93/100
✅A1The expert-interview-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
93
Stress✅ Pass
Step 5: Final Assembly

The Step 5: Final Assembly path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.

Basic 31/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 93/100
✅A1The expert-interview-generator output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total94.6 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Other with execution mode B
  • Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 81.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/1; adjustment=5. flow.py: OK