Academic Writing
faq-generator
85100Total Score
Core Capability
88 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
18 / 20 Passed
90Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols. Trigger when user provides medical documents, policies, or protocols and requests FAQ generation, patient education materials, or simplified explanations
4/4
86Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
4/4
84Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols. Trigger when user provides medical documents, policies, or protocols and requests FAQ generation, patient education materials, or simplified explanations
4/4
82Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
4/4
76End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols. Trigger when user provides medical documents, policies, or protocols and requests FAQ generation, patient education materials, or simplified explanations
2/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific integrity remained intact because the package rewrote or structured material without fabricating findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The archived review kept this package within Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols. Trigger when user provides..., not result fabrication or expert advice. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols. Trigger when user provides medical documents, policies, or protocols and requests FAQ generation, patient education materials, or simplified explanations workflow. |
| Code Usability | N/A | This package is judged mainly on writing behavior, so code usability is not a central evaluation target here. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
Functional fit remained strong, though the final communication package could still be a little tighter.
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
The archived deduction in reliability traces back to: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
No point loss was recorded for performance context in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The archived score suggests slightly clearer routing would help an agent choose the right dissemination path faster.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
No point loss was recorded for human usability in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Security
A modest security gap remained because the package could make its safe-use limits even clearer.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
The archived review treated the package as maintainable overall, while still leaving some cleanup headroom.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
Agent specific was softened by the legacy issue 'Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior'. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total88 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
90
Canonical
Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols. Trigger when user provides medical documents, policies, or protocols and requests FAQ generation, patient education materials, or simplified explanations
4/4 ✓
86
Variant A
Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
4/4 ✓
84
Edge
Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols. Trigger when user provides medical documents, policies, or protocols and requests FAQ generation, patient education materials, or simplified explanations
4/4 ✓
82
Variant B
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
4/4 ✓
76
Stress
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols. Trigger when user provides medical documents, policies, or protocols and requests FAQ generation, patient education materials, or simplified explanations
2/4 ✓
90
Canonical✅ Pass
Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols. Trigger when user provides medical documents, policies, or protocols and requests FAQ generation, patient education materials, or simplified explanations
The Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols.... scenario completed within the documented Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols. Trigger when user provides... boundary.
Basic 38/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 90/100
✅A1The faq-generator output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
The archived evaluation treated Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit... as a clean in-scope run.
Basic 36/40|Specialized 50/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The faq-generator output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
84
Edge✅ Pass
Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols. Trigger when user provides medical documents, policies, or protocols and requests FAQ generation, patient education materials, or simplified explanations
The archived evaluation treated Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols.... as a clean in-scope run.
Basic 35/40|Specialized 49/60|Total 84/100
✅A1The faq-generator output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
82
Variant B✅ Pass
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
The Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py scenario completed within the documented Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols. Trigger when user provides... boundary.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 48/60|Total 82/100
✅A1The faq-generator output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
76
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Generates FAQ lists from complex medical policies or protocols. Trigger when user provides medical documents, policies, or protocols and requests FAQ generation, patient education materials, or simplified explanations
This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Basic 31/40|Specialized 45/60|Total 76/100
✅A1The faq-generator output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
❌A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
❌A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 2 / 4
Medical Task Total83.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review