Other

file-management

Organize, back up, compress, split, and merge files/folders using rule-driven plans; use when you need safe previews, conflict handling, and verification before executing file operations.

90100Total Score
Core Capability
88 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
95You need to reorganize a directory (move/copy/rename) based on include/exclude patterns and a target folder structure
4/4
91You want a repeatable backup workflow (copy or archive) with optional retention rules and verification manifests
4/4
89Safety-first planning: generate a preview/manifest of intended actions before writing changes
4/4
89Rule-driven scope control: root path + include/exclude patterns + thresholds + target structure (see references/rule-schema.md)
4/4
89End-to-end case for Safety-first planning: generate a preview/manifest of intended actions before writing changes
4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS

Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability
Functional suitability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
The archived deduction in reliability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
No point loss was recorded for performance context in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for file-management under agent usability.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
Human usability reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The legacy audit deducted points for file-management in security.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for file-management under maintainability.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
The archived deduction in agent specific traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total88 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 90.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

95
Canonical
You need to reorganize a directory (move/copy/rename) based on include/exclude patterns and a target folder structure
4/4 ✓
91
Variant A
You want a repeatable backup workflow (copy or archive) with optional retention rules and verification manifests
4/4 ✓
89
Edge
Safety-first planning: generate a preview/manifest of intended actions before writing changes
4/4 ✓
89
Variant B
Rule-driven scope control: root path + include/exclude patterns + thresholds + target structure (see references/rule-schema.md)
4/4 ✓
89
Stress
End-to-end case for Safety-first planning: generate a preview/manifest of intended actions before writing changes
4/4 ✓
95
Canonical✅ Pass
You need to reorganize a directory (move/copy/rename) based on include/exclude patterns and a target folder structure

You need to reorganize a directory (move/copy/rename) based on... remained tied to the documented analysis contract even when the preserved evidence centered on instructions instead of a full rerun.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 59/60|Total 95/100
✅A1The file-management output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
91
Variant A✅ Pass
You want a repeatable backup workflow (copy or archive) with optional retention rules and verification manifests

You want a repeatable backup workflow (copy or archive) with... remained tied to the documented analysis contract even when the preserved evidence centered on instructions instead of a full rerun.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 91/100
✅A1The file-management output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
89
Edge✅ Pass
Safety-first planning: generate a preview/manifest of intended actions before writing changes

This edge case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.

Basic 33/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 89/100
✅A1The file-management output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
89
Variant B✅ Pass
Rule-driven scope control: root path + include/exclude patterns + thresholds + target structure (see references/rule-schema.md)

This variant b case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.

Basic 32/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 89/100
✅A1The file-management output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
89
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Safety-first planning: generate a preview/manifest of intended actions before writing changes

This stress case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.

Basic 29/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 89/100
✅A1The file-management output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total90.6 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Other with execution mode B
  • Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 77.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: Script verification 2/2; adjustment=5. merge_parts.py: OK; split_file.py: OK