grant-gantt-chart-gen
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived audit treated this workflow as hypothesis or protocol support, not as a source of validated results. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package remained focused on source handling, lookup, or structured evidence use. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | No methodological-grounding issue was recorded for grant-gantt-chart-gen in the archived evaluation. |
| Code Usability | PASS | No code-usability failure was preserved for grant-gantt-chart-gen in the legacy evaluation. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
Use grant gantt chart gen for evidence insight workflows that need... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented Use grant gantt chart gen for evidence insight workflows that need structured execution,... boundary.
The archived run for Use grant gantt chart gen for evidence insight workflows that need... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
The Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py scenario completed within the documented Use grant gantt chart gen for evidence insight workflows that need structured execution,... boundary.
The preserved weakness for End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use grant gantt chart gen for evidence insight workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries was concentrated in one point: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review