graphical-abstract-wizard
Generate graphical abstract layout recommendations based on paper abstracts.
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived review kept this workflow anchored to supplied data fields and observable execution behavior, not fabricated results. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The archived review kept this package within Generate graphical abstract layout recommendations based on paper abstracts, not freeform inference detached from source data. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | Methodological grounding was preserved through the documented inputs, transformations, and expected artifacts. |
| Code Usability | PASS | Code usability passed because the package still exposed a reviewable execution surface for its documented workflow. |
Core Capability83 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 87.2 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
Generate graphical abstract layout recommendations based on paper... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The archived evaluation treated Use this skill for data analysis tasks that require explicit... as a clean in-scope run.
For Generate graphical abstract layout recommendations based on paper..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
The Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py scenario completed within the documented Generate graphical abstract layout recommendations based on paper abstracts boundary.
The main issue in this stress run was: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 87.2/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review