hgnc-api
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific content remained anchored to fetched metadata or source-linked evidence in the legacy review. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Access the HGNC (HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee) database to search for and retrieve gene information including symbols, names, IDs, and other metadata workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy evaluation did not preserve a usability failure in the packaged retrieval path. |
Core Capability72 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 94.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
The archived evidence for Access the HGNC (HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee) database to... shows a real execution snag, though not one that erased the workflow contract.
The archived evidence for Access the HGNC (HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee) database to... shows a real execution snag, though not one that erased the workflow contract.
The Access the HGNC (HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee) database to... workflow remained defined, but this run surfaced a recoverable execution problem.
The archived evidence for Packaged executable path(s): scripts/hgnc.py shows a real execution snag, though not one that erased the workflow contract.
Access the HGNC (HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee) database to search for and retrieve gene... kept a coherent task boundary even though the preserved run encountered a recoverable error.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 72/100 and dynamic average is 81.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/1; adjustment=5. hgnc.py: OK