jaspar-api
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The legacy audit did not indicate that retrieval outputs were presented as unsupported findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The older review treated the package logic as methodologically aligned with its stated workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The packaged retrieval surface remained understandable at the command and parameter level in the archived review. |
Core Capability77 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 95.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
The archived evaluation treated Access JASPAR database for transcription factor binding profiles... as a clean in-scope run.
The Access JASPAR database for transcription factor binding profiles... scenario completed within the documented Access JASPAR database for transcription factor binding profiles (matrices), collections,... boundary.
The Access JASPAR database for transcription factor binding profiles... scenario completed within the documented Access JASPAR database for transcription factor binding profiles (matrices), collections,... boundary.
The archived evaluation treated Packaged executable path(s): scripts/jaspar_client.py as a clean in-scope run.
The archived evaluation treated Access JASPAR database for transcription factor binding profiles (matrices), collections,... as a clean in-scope run.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 77/100 and dynamic average is 82.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/1; adjustment=5. jaspar_client.py: OK