journal-latest-issue
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific content remained anchored to fetched metadata or source-linked evidence in the legacy review. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The legacy review kept this workflow on the evidence-access side of the boundary, not the advice-giving side. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | No methodological-grounding issue was recorded for journal-latest-issue in the archived evaluation. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy evaluation did not preserve a usability failure in the packaged retrieval path. |
Core Capability83 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 96 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
The archived run for You want the latest issue table of contents (TOC) for one or more... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
For You need a structured digest (title/DOI/abstract) plus Chinese key..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
For Fetches the latest issue TOC and (optionally) abstracts by crawling..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
The archived run for Supports multiple input sources: journal name, RSS, TOC URL, and... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
The End-to-end case for Fetches the latest issue TOC and (optionally)... path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 2/2; adjustment=5. journal_digest.py: OK; validate_skill.py: OK