Evidence Insight
journal-skills
86100Total Score
Core Capability
87 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
9 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
15 / 20 Passed
86You have a manuscript title/abstract and need a shortlist of suitable journals to submit to
3/4
86You want evidence-based journal matching using similar PubMed literature and journal distribution statistics
3/4
86Topic- and abstract-driven journal recommendation workflow
3/4
86PubMed-based similar literature search and journal frequency distribution compilation
3/4
86End-to-end case for Topic- and abstract-driven journal recommendation workflow
3/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific content remained anchored to fetched metadata or source-linked evidence in the legacy review. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The legacy review kept this workflow on the evidence-access side of the boundary, not the advice-giving side. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Recommends target journals for manuscript submission by analyzing the paper topic/abstract and the journal distribution of similar PubMed literature workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy evaluation did not preserve a usability failure in the packaged retrieval path. |
Core Capability87 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
Functional suitability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Reliability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
No point loss was recorded for performance context in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The legacy audit deducted points for journal-skills in agent usability.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
Human usability reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The legacy audit deducted points for journal-skills in security.
9 / 12
75%
Maintainability
The legacy audit deducted points for journal-skills in maintainability.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
Related legacy finding for journal-skills: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total87 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 86 / 100 — Assertions: 15/20 Passed
86
Canonical
You have a manuscript title/abstract and need a shortlist of suitable journals to submit to
3/4 ✓
86
Variant A
You want evidence-based journal matching using similar PubMed literature and journal distribution statistics
3/4 ✓
86
Edge
Topic- and abstract-driven journal recommendation workflow
3/4 ✓
86
Variant B
PubMed-based similar literature search and journal frequency distribution compilation
3/4 ✓
86
Stress
End-to-end case for Topic- and abstract-driven journal recommendation workflow
3/4 ✓
86
Canonical✅ Pass
You have a manuscript title/abstract and need a shortlist of suitable journals to submit to
The preserved weakness for You have a manuscript title/abstract and need a shortlist of suitable journals to submit to was concentrated in one point: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
Basic 33/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The journal-skills output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
You want evidence-based journal matching using similar PubMed literature and journal distribution statistics
The main issue in this variant a run was: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
Basic 31/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The journal-skills output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Edge✅ Pass
Topic- and abstract-driven journal recommendation workflow
The preserved weakness for Topic- and abstract-driven journal recommendation workflow was concentrated in one point: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
Basic 30/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The journal-skills output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Variant B✅ Pass
PubMed-based similar literature search and journal frequency distribution compilation
This variant b case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
Basic 29/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The journal-skills output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Topic- and abstract-driven journal recommendation workflow
The preserved weakness for End-to-end case for Topic- and abstract-driven journal recommendation workflow was concentrated in one point: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.
Basic 26/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The journal-skills output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
Medical Task Total86 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 87/100 and dynamic average is 73.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 0/1; adjustment=0. pubmed_journal_recommender.py: rc=1