lay-summary-gen
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived evaluation preserved source-faithful writing behavior without adding unsupported results or conclusions. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package kept to Converts complex medical abstracts into plain language summaries for instead of claiming new evidence. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The older review treated the package logic as methodologically aligned with its stated workflow. |
| Code Usability | N/A | The core deliverable is textual rather than executable, which makes code usability not applicable in this case. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
The Converts complex medical abstracts into plain language summaries for scenario completed within the documented Converts complex medical abstracts into plain language summaries for boundary.
The Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented Converts complex medical abstracts into plain language summaries for boundary.
Converts complex medical abstracts into plain language summaries for remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The archived evaluation treated Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py as a clean in-scope run.
This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review