Evidence Insight

literature-close-read

87100Total Score
Core Capability
85 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
9 / 12
Performance & Context
7 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
11 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
92When you have a full paper converted from PDF to Markdown and need a structured, in-depth interpretation rather than a brief abstract-style summary
4/4
88When you must extract reproducible experimental details (datasets, settings, controls, metrics, statistics) for replication or reimplementation
4/4
86Reads the entire Markdown paper text, prioritizing Methods and Results for technical fidelity
4/4
86Produces a structured close-reading report in Markdown (UTF-8), following a predefined template
4/4
86End-to-end case for Reads the entire Markdown paper text, prioritizing Methods and Results for technical fidelity
4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS
Research Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
DimensionResultDetail
Scientific IntegrityPASSThe legacy audit did not indicate that retrieval outputs were presented as unsupported findings.
Practice BoundariesPASSThe package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation.
Methodological GroundPASSThe legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Produce a structured close-reading report from a paper's full PDF-to-Markdown text (with ## Page XX pagination and image references) when you need to systematically extract background, research questions, methods, results, limitations, and reproducible experimental details workflow.
Code UsabilityN/AThe package is evaluated primarily as a structured deliverable rather than an executable scientific code workflow.

Core Capability85 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability
Functional suitability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
The archived deduction in reliability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
9 / 12
75%
Performance & Context
A modest deduction remained in performance context for literature-close-read in the archived review.
7 / 8
88%
Agent Usability
The legacy audit deducted points for literature-close-read in agent usability.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
The legacy audit gave full marks to human usability for this package.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The legacy audit deducted points for literature-close-read in security.
11 / 12
92%
Maintainability
A modest deduction remained in maintainability for literature-close-read in the archived review.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
Related legacy finding for literature-close-read: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total85 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 87.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

92
Canonical
When you have a full paper converted from PDF to Markdown and need a structured, in-depth interpretation rather than a brief abstract-style summary
4/4 ✓
88
Variant A
When you must extract reproducible experimental details (datasets, settings, controls, metrics, statistics) for replication or reimplementation
4/4 ✓
86
Edge
Reads the entire Markdown paper text, prioritizing Methods and Results for technical fidelity
4/4 ✓
86
Variant B
Produces a structured close-reading report in Markdown (UTF-8), following a predefined template
4/4 ✓
86
Stress
End-to-end case for Reads the entire Markdown paper text, prioritizing Methods and Results for technical fidelity
4/4 ✓
92
Canonical✅ Pass
When you have a full paper converted from PDF to Markdown and need a structured, in-depth interpretation rather than a brief abstract-style summary

When you have a full paper converted from PDF to Markdown and need... was evaluated as a bounded documentation path, not as a runnable script workflow.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 92/100
✅A1The literature-close-read output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
88
Variant A✅ Pass
When you must extract reproducible experimental details (datasets, settings, controls, metrics, statistics) for replication or reimplementation

This variant a case stayed inside the documented workflow and remained instruction-led.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 88/100
✅A1The literature-close-read output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Edge✅ Pass
Reads the entire Markdown paper text, prioritizing Methods and Results for technical fidelity

This edge case stayed inside the documented workflow and remained instruction-led.

Basic 33/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-close-read output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant B✅ Pass
Produces a structured close-reading report in Markdown (UTF-8), following a predefined template

This variant b case stayed inside the documented workflow and remained instruction-led.

Basic 32/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-close-read output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Reads the entire Markdown paper text, prioritizing Methods and Results for technical fidelity

End-to-end case for Reads the entire Markdown paper text,... was evaluated as a bounded documentation path, not as a runnable script workflow.

Basic 29/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-close-read output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total87.6 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode A
  • Static quality score is 85/100 and dynamic average is 79.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: No script verification was applicable