Evidence Insight
literature-experiment-extract
86100Total Score
Core Capability
84 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
9 / 12
Performance & Context
7 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
92You have a paper converted to Markdown (e.g., via PDF-to-Markdown) and need to extract cell/animal models used in experiments
4/4
88You need a structured list of experimental methods/protocols described in the paper, with traceable evidence
4/4
86Extracts three entity groups from paper Markdown:
4/4
86Experimental models (cell lines, animal models, strains, genotypes, etc.)
4/4
86End-to-end case for Extracts three entity groups from paper Markdown:
4/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific integrity held because the package framed recommendations as plans to be tested, not facts already established. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package remained focused on source handling, lookup, or structured evidence use. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | No methodological-grounding issue was recorded for literature-experiment-extract in the archived evaluation. |
| Code Usability | N/A | This skill produces design-oriented guidance rather than runnable analysis code, which makes code usability non-gating in this review. |
Core Capability84 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
The archived deduction in functional suitability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Reliability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
9 / 12
75%
Performance & Context
The archived evaluation left some headroom for literature-experiment-extract under performance context.
7 / 8
88%
Agent Usability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for literature-experiment-extract under agent usability.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
The legacy audit gave full marks to human usability for this package.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The legacy audit deducted points for literature-experiment-extract in security.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
The legacy audit deducted points for literature-experiment-extract in maintainability.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
Agent specific was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total84 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 87.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
92
Canonical
You have a paper converted to Markdown (e.g., via PDF-to-Markdown) and need to extract cell/animal models used in experiments
4/4 ✓
88
Variant A
You need a structured list of experimental methods/protocols described in the paper, with traceable evidence
4/4 ✓
86
Edge
Extracts three entity groups from paper Markdown:
4/4 ✓
86
Variant B
Experimental models (cell lines, animal models, strains, genotypes, etc.)
4/4 ✓
86
Stress
End-to-end case for Extracts three entity groups from paper Markdown:
4/4 ✓
92
Canonical✅ Pass
You have a paper converted to Markdown (e.g., via PDF-to-Markdown) and need to extract cell/animal models used in experiments
The archived run treated You have a paper converted to Markdown (e.g., via PDF-to-Markdown)... as a protocol-design path rather than an executable workflow.
Basic 36/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 92/100
✅A1The literature-experiment-extract output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
88
Variant A✅ Pass
You need a structured list of experimental methods/protocols described in the paper, with traceable evidence
The archived run treated You need a structured list of experimental methods/protocols... as a protocol-design path rather than an executable workflow.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 88/100
✅A1The literature-experiment-extract output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Edge✅ Pass
Extracts three entity groups from paper Markdown:
The archived run treated Extracts three entity groups from paper Markdown: as a protocol-design path rather than an executable workflow.
Basic 33/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-experiment-extract output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant B✅ Pass
Experimental models (cell lines, animal models, strains, genotypes, etc.)
This variant b case remained a study-design support path, not a code-driven execution run.
Basic 32/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-experiment-extract output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Extracts three entity groups from paper Markdown:
The archived run treated End-to-end case for Extracts three entity groups from paper Markdown: as a protocol-design path rather than an executable workflow.
Basic 29/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-experiment-extract output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total87.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode A
- Static quality score is 84/100 and dynamic average is 79.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: No script verification was applicable