literature-extensive-read
Rapidly skim and summarize academic papers (default:PDF-to-Markdown full text with `## Page XX` pagination and image references) and output a structured extensive-reading summary in Markdown when you need to quickly understand research questions, methods, key results, conclusions, and decide whether intensive reading is worthwhile.
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific content remained anchored to fetched metadata or source-linked evidence in the legacy review. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Rapidly skim and summarize academic papers (default: PDF-to-Markdown full text with ## Page XX pagination and image references) and output a structured extensive-reading summary in Markdown when you need to quickly understand research questions, methods, key results, conclusions, and decide whether intensive reading is worthwhile workflow. |
| Code Usability | N/A | This package is packaging-first and output-first, not code-first, so code usability is treated as not applicable. |
Core Capability84 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 87.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
This canonical case stayed inside the documented workflow and remained instruction-led.
You need to extract the research question, methodology, main... was evaluated as a bounded documentation path, not as a runnable script workflow.
The archived run for Rapid extensive reading workflow: prioritize... remained guidance-driven rather than command-driven.
This variant b case stayed inside the documented workflow and remained instruction-led.
The archived run for End-to-end case for Rapid extensive reading workflow: prioritize... remained guidance-driven rather than command-driven.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode A
- Static quality score is 84/100 and dynamic average is 79.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: No script verification was applicable