Evidence Insight
literature-extensive-read
86100Total Score
Core Capability
84 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
9 / 12
Performance & Context
7 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
11 / 12
Maintainability
8 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
92You have a paper converted from PDF to Markdown and need a fast, structured overview before deciding to read it deeply
4/4
88You need to extract the research question, methodology, main findings, and conclusions for literature triage
4/4
86Rapid extensive reading workflow: prioritize title/abstract/conclusion, then scan methods and results
4/4
86Structured output using a predefined Markdown template
4/4
86End-to-end case for Rapid extensive reading workflow: prioritize title/abstract/conclusion, then scan methods and results
4/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific content remained anchored to fetched metadata or source-linked evidence in the legacy review. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Rapidly skim and summarize academic papers (default: PDF-to-Markdown full text with ## Page XX pagination and image references) and output a structured extensive-reading summary in Markdown when you need to quickly understand research questions, methods, key results, conclusions, and decide whether intensive reading is worthwhile workflow. |
| Code Usability | N/A | This package is packaging-first and output-first, not code-first, so code usability is treated as not applicable. |
Core Capability84 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
Related legacy finding for literature-extensive-read: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Related legacy finding for literature-extensive-read: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
9 / 12
75%
Performance & Context
A modest deduction remained in performance context for literature-extensive-read in the archived review.
7 / 8
88%
Agent Usability
A modest deduction remained in agent usability for literature-extensive-read in the archived review.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
Human usability reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The legacy audit deducted points for literature-extensive-read in security.
11 / 12
92%
Maintainability
The legacy audit deducted points for literature-extensive-read in maintainability.
8 / 12
67%
Agent-Specific
The archived deduction in agent specific traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total84 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 87.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
92
Canonical
You have a paper converted from PDF to Markdown and need a fast, structured overview before deciding to read it deeply
4/4 ✓
88
Variant A
You need to extract the research question, methodology, main findings, and conclusions for literature triage
4/4 ✓
86
Edge
Rapid extensive reading workflow: prioritize title/abstract/conclusion, then scan methods and results
4/4 ✓
86
Variant B
Structured output using a predefined Markdown template
4/4 ✓
86
Stress
End-to-end case for Rapid extensive reading workflow: prioritize title/abstract/conclusion, then scan methods and results
4/4 ✓
92
Canonical✅ Pass
You have a paper converted from PDF to Markdown and need a fast, structured overview before deciding to read it deeply
This canonical case stayed inside the documented workflow and remained instruction-led.
Basic 36/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 92/100
✅A1The literature-extensive-read output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
88
Variant A✅ Pass
You need to extract the research question, methodology, main findings, and conclusions for literature triage
You need to extract the research question, methodology, main... was evaluated as a bounded documentation path, not as a runnable script workflow.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 88/100
✅A1The literature-extensive-read output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Edge✅ Pass
Rapid extensive reading workflow: prioritize title/abstract/conclusion, then scan methods and results
The archived run for Rapid extensive reading workflow: prioritize... remained guidance-driven rather than command-driven.
Basic 33/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-extensive-read output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant B✅ Pass
Structured output using a predefined Markdown template
This variant b case stayed inside the documented workflow and remained instruction-led.
Basic 32/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-extensive-read output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Rapid extensive reading workflow: prioritize title/abstract/conclusion, then scan methods and results
The archived run for End-to-end case for Rapid extensive reading workflow: prioritize... remained guidance-driven rather than command-driven.
Basic 29/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The literature-extensive-read output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total87.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode A
- Static quality score is 84/100 and dynamic average is 79.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: No script verification was applicable