Academic Writing
market-access-value
85100Total Score
Core Capability
88 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
18 / 20 Passed
90Use market access value for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
4/4
86Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
4/4
84Use market access value for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
4/4
82Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
4/4
76End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use market access value for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
2/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific integrity remained intact because the package rewrote or structured material without fabricating findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The archived review kept this package within Use market access value for academic writing workflows that need structured execution,..., not result fabrication or expert advice. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | No methodological-grounding issue was recorded for market-access-value in the archived evaluation. |
| Code Usability | N/A | This package is judged mainly on writing behavior, so code usability is not a central evaluation target here. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
Functional fit remained strong, though the final communication package could still be a little tighter.
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Reliability was softened by the legacy issue 'Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior'. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
No point loss was recorded for performance context in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
Agent usability was strong, though the workflow could surface its main conversion branches more directly.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
The legacy audit gave full marks to human usability for this package.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The workflow stayed safe overall, with only a small remaining deduction around boundary signaling.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
The workflow is low-risk to maintain, though a little more structural cleanup would likely close the remaining gap.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
The archived deduction in agent specific traces back to: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total88 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
90
Canonical
Use market access value for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
4/4 ✓
86
Variant A
Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
4/4 ✓
84
Edge
Use market access value for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
4/4 ✓
82
Variant B
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
4/4 ✓
76
Stress
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use market access value for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
2/4 ✓
90
Canonical✅ Pass
Use market access value for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
The archived evaluation treated Use market access value for academic writing workflows that need... as a clean in-scope run.
Basic 38/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 90/100
✅A1The market-access-value output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
The Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented Use market access value for academic writing workflows that need structured execution,... boundary.
Basic 36/40|Specialized 50/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The market-access-value output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
84
Edge✅ Pass
Use market access value for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
For Use market access value for academic writing workflows that need..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
Basic 35/40|Specialized 49/60|Total 84/100
✅A1The market-access-value output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
82
Variant B✅ Pass
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
The Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py scenario completed within the documented Use market access value for academic writing workflows that need structured execution,... boundary.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 48/60|Total 82/100
✅A1The market-access-value output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
76
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use market access value for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Basic 31/40|Specialized 45/60|Total 76/100
✅A1The market-access-value output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
❌A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
❌A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 2 / 4
Medical Task Total83.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review