meta-baseline-generator
Generates a meta-analysis baseline characteristics section (text + table) from raw data. Supports Chinese and English. Use when the user provides baseline data and wants a formatted results section.
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The legacy review did not flag invented scientific claims in the package's writing-oriented output. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The evaluated outputs stayed inside the Generates a meta-analysis baseline characteristics section (text + table) from raw data.... workflow rather than drifting into unsupported scientific interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Generates a meta-analysis baseline characteristics section (text + table) from raw data. Supports Chinese and English workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy audit did not flag code-usability issues for the packaged meta-baseline-generator workflow. |
Core Capability82 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 91.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
The archived run for Generates a meta-analysis baseline characteristics section (text +... stayed on the narrative-deliverable path rather than a code path.
The archived run for Generates a meta-analysis baseline characteristics section (text +... stayed on the narrative-deliverable path rather than a code path.
Generates a meta-analysis baseline characteristics section (text +... remained a writing-first workflow and was evaluated without depending on a runnable helper script.
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/text_processor.py remained a writing-first workflow and was evaluated without depending on a runnable helper script.
This stress case was handled as a bounded writing workflow, not as an executable pipeline.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 82/100 and dynamic average is 78.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/1; adjustment=5. text_processor.py: OK