Data Analysis
meta-feasibility-analyzer
86100Total Score
Core Capability
78 / 100
Functional Suitability
10 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
12 / 16
Human Usability
6 / 8
Security
8 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
15 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
95Analyzes the feasibility of a proposed Meta-analysis topic by searching for existing Meta-analyses and Clinical Trials on PubMed/ClinicalTrials.gov. Use when you need to evaluate if a topic is viable for a new Meta-analysis
4/4
91Analyzes the feasibility of a proposed Meta-analysis topic by searching for existing Meta-analyses and Clinical Trials on PubMed/ClinicalTrials.gov. Use when you need to evaluate if a topic is viable for a new Meta-analysis
4/4
89Extract Query String
4/4
89Generate Search Query
4/4
89Output
4/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived review kept this workflow anchored to supplied data fields and observable execution behavior, not fabricated results. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The archived review kept this package within Analyzes the feasibility of a proposed Meta-analysis topic by searching for existing..., not freeform inference detached from source data. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The archived evaluation treated the workflow as method-linked rather than ad hoc. |
| Code Usability | PASS | Code usability passed because the package still exposed a reviewable execution surface for its documented workflow. |
Core Capability78 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
The archived deduction in functional suitability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Reliability
Reliability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
No point loss was recorded for performance context in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The archived review left some headroom in how quickly an agent can lock onto the intended analysis path.
12 / 16
75%
Human Usability
The package is readable overall, though the archived review still left a small human-usability gap.
6 / 8
75%
Security
Security remained strong, though the archived review still left some room for clearer execution guardrails.
8 / 12
67%
Maintainability
The archived review treated the package as maintainable, while still preserving some room for cleanup.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
Related legacy finding for meta-feasibility-analyzer: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
15 / 20
75%
Core Capability Total78 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 90.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
95
Canonical
Analyzes the feasibility of a proposed Meta-analysis topic by searching for existing Meta-analyses and Clinical Trials on PubMed/ClinicalTrials.gov. Use when you need to evaluate if a topic is viable for a new Meta-analysis
4/4 ✓
91
Variant A
Analyzes the feasibility of a proposed Meta-analysis topic by searching for existing Meta-analyses and Clinical Trials on PubMed/ClinicalTrials.gov. Use when you need to evaluate if a topic is viable for a new Meta-analysis
4/4 ✓
89
Edge
Extract Query String
4/4 ✓
89
Variant B
Generate Search Query
4/4 ✓
89
Stress
Output
4/4 ✓
95
Canonical✅ Pass
Analyzes the feasibility of a proposed Meta-analysis topic by searching for existing Meta-analyses and Clinical Trials on PubMed/ClinicalTrials.gov. Use when you need to evaluate if a topic is viable for a new Meta-analysis
Analyzes the feasibility of a proposed Meta-analysis topic by... remained an analysis-style extraction path whose value came from structured data capture rather than a freeform narrative response.
Basic 35/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 95/100
✅A1The meta-feasibility-analyzer output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
91
Variant A✅ Pass
Analyzes the feasibility of a proposed Meta-analysis topic by searching for existing Meta-analyses and Clinical Trials on PubMed/ClinicalTrials.gov. Use when you need to evaluate if a topic is viable for a new Meta-analysis
Analyzes the feasibility of a proposed Meta-analysis topic by... remained an analysis-style extraction path whose value came from structured data capture rather than a freeform narrative response.
Basic 33/40|Specialized 58/60|Total 91/100
✅A1The meta-feasibility-analyzer output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
89
Edge✅ Pass
Extract Query String
This edge case stayed focused on extracting and normalizing evidence from the provided records instead of drifting into unsupported interpretation.
Basic 32/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 89/100
✅A1The meta-feasibility-analyzer output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
89
Variant B✅ Pass
Generate Search Query
This variant b case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.
Basic 31/40|Specialized 58/60|Total 89/100
✅A1The meta-feasibility-analyzer output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
89
Stress✅ Pass
Output
The archived run treated Output as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.
Basic 28/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 89/100
✅A1The meta-feasibility-analyzer output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total90.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 78/100 and dynamic average is 77.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/1; adjustment=5. feasibility_ops.py: OK