Data Analysis

meta-funnel-plot

85100Total Score
Core Capability
83 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
13 / 16
Human Usability
7 / 8
Security
9 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
91"Generate Meta-analysis funnel plots and perform publication bias testing. Takes CSV file with Meta-analysis data as input, outputs funnel plot PNG, Egger test and Begg test results."
4/4
87Step 2: Execute R Script
4/4
85Step 1: Validate Input Data
4/4
85Step 3: Output Results
4/4
85Step 3: Output Results
4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS
Research Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
DimensionResultDetail
Scientific IntegrityPASSScientific integrity held because extraction and analysis outputs stayed tied to provided text, metadata, or runtime evidence rather than invented study findings.
Practice BoundariesPASSPractice boundaries held because the package remained focused on "Generate Meta-analysis funnel plots and perform publication bias testing. Takes CSV file... rather than overclaiming what the records supported.
Methodological GroundPASSThe archived review found the package methodologically anchored to a named assessment rule set.
Code UsabilityPASSNo code-usability failure was preserved for meta-funnel-plot in the legacy evaluation.

Core Capability83 / 1008 Categories

Functional Suitability
The archived deduction in functional suitability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Reliability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
Performance context reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
Agent usability was strong, but the workflow could surface its entry conditions a little more directly.
13 / 16
81%
Human Usability
The archived score suggests the output contract could be a little easier for users to inspect or reuse.
7 / 8
88%
Security
A modest security gap remained in the archived evaluation despite otherwise controlled workflow behavior.
9 / 12
75%
Maintainability
Maintainability stayed solid, with only limited room to simplify scripts, dependencies, or packaging structure.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
Agent specific was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total83 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 86.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

91
Canonical
"Generate Meta-analysis funnel plots and perform publication bias testing. Takes CSV file with Meta-analysis data as input, outputs funnel plot PNG, Egger test and Begg test results."
4/4
87
Variant A
Step 2: Execute R Script
4/4
85
Edge
Step 1: Validate Input Data
4/4
85
Variant B
Step 3: Output Results
4/4
85
Stress
Step 3: Output Results
4/4
91
Canonical✅ Pass
"Generate Meta-analysis funnel plots and perform publication bias testing. Takes CSV file with Meta-analysis data as input, outputs funnel plot PNG, Egger test and Begg test results."

This canonical case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 91/100
A1The meta-funnel-plot output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
87
Variant A✅ Pass
Step 2: Execute R Script

The archived run treated Step 2: Execute R Script as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 87/100
A1The meta-funnel-plot output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
85
Edge✅ Pass
Step 1: Validate Input Data

The archived run treated Step 1: Validate Input Data as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.

Basic 33/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 85/100
A1The meta-funnel-plot output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
85
Variant B✅ Pass
Step 3: Output Results

This variant b case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.

Basic 32/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 85/100
A1The meta-funnel-plot output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
85
Stress✅ Pass
Step 3: Output Results

The archived run treated Step 3: Output Results as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.

Basic 29/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 85/100
A1The meta-funnel-plot output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total86.6 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
  • Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 78.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: Script verification 0/2; adjustment=0. funnel_plot.py: rc=1; run_funnel_plot.py: rc=1