Academic Writing

meta-results-forest-plot-analyzer

90100Total Score
Core Capability
83 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
13 / 16
Human Usability
7 / 8
Security
9 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
99Analyzes forest plots for meta-analysis, generating detailed descriptions and formatting figure legends in Chinese or English
4/4
95Output Formatting (Script)
4/4
93Output Formatting (Script)
4/4
93Output Formatting (Script)
4/4
93Output Formatting (Script)
4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS
Research Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
DimensionResultDetail
Scientific IntegrityPASSScientific integrity remained intact because the package rewrote or structured material without fabricating findings.
Practice BoundariesPASSThe evaluated outputs stayed inside the Analyzes forest plots for meta-analysis, generating detailed descriptions and formatting... workflow rather than drifting into unsupported scientific interpretation.
Methodological GroundPASSNo methodological-grounding issue was recorded for meta-results-forest-plot-analyzer in the archived evaluation.
Code UsabilityPASSNo code-usability failure was preserved for meta-results-forest-plot-analyzer in the legacy evaluation.

Core Capability83 / 1008 Categories

Functional Suitability
The writing workflow lands well overall, with minor remaining headroom in the final deliverable contract.
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
A small reliability gap remained around the more demanding writing-to-format conversion paths.
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
No point loss was recorded for performance context in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The archived score suggests slightly clearer routing would help an agent choose the right dissemination path faster.
13 / 16
81%
Human Usability
Related legacy finding for meta-results-forest-plot-analyzer: Minor polish before wide rollout. No major defects found
7 / 8
88%
Security
The workflow stayed safe overall, with only a small remaining deduction around boundary signaling.
9 / 12
75%
Maintainability
The archived review treated the package as maintainable overall, while still leaving some cleanup headroom.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
The archived score suggests this workflow could make its orchestration cues a little more explicit for agents.
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total83 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 94.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

99
Canonical
Analyzes forest plots for meta-analysis, generating detailed descriptions and formatting figure legends in Chinese or English
4/4
95
Variant A
Output Formatting (Script)
4/4
93
Edge
Output Formatting (Script)
4/4
93
Variant B
Output Formatting (Script)
4/4
93
Stress
Output Formatting (Script)
4/4
99
Canonical✅ Pass
Analyzes forest plots for meta-analysis, generating detailed descriptions and formatting figure legends in Chinese or English

The Analyzes forest plots for meta-analysis, generating detailed... path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.

Basic 38/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 99/100
A1The meta-results-forest-plot-analyzer output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
95
Variant A✅ Pass
Output Formatting (Script)

The archived run for Output Formatting (Script) confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 59/60|Total 95/100
A1The meta-results-forest-plot-analyzer output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
93
Edge✅ Pass
Output Formatting (Script)

For Output Formatting (Script), the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 35/40|Specialized 58/60|Total 93/100
A1The meta-results-forest-plot-analyzer output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
93
Variant B✅ Pass
Output Formatting (Script)

For Output Formatting (Script), the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 59/60|Total 93/100
A1The meta-results-forest-plot-analyzer output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
93
Stress✅ Pass
Output Formatting (Script)

For Output Formatting (Script), the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.

Basic 31/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 93/100
A1The meta-results-forest-plot-analyzer output structure matches the documented deliverable
A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total94.6 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
  • Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/2; adjustment=3. format_result.py: rc=1; validate_skill.py: OK