Other

mindmap

Generate mindmaps locally/offline with native HTML/CSS/JS (no external libraries); use when you need to parse Plain Text node structures or map LLM outputs into an on-device visualization.

86100Total Score
Core Capability
85 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
9 / 12
Performance & Context
7 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
11 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
90You need to render mindmaps in offline, air-gapped, or internal-network environments where CDN access is unavailable
4/4
86You want a zero-dependency renderer using only native HTML/CSS/JS (no third-party visualization libraries)
4/4
85Local mindmap rendering using a single HTML file: assets/local-mindmap/index.html
4/4
85Plain Text → node structure parsing (format and rules defined in the reference document)
4/4
85End-to-end case for Local mindmap rendering using a single HTML file: assets/local-mindmap/index.html
4/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS

Core Capability85 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability
The archived deduction in functional suitability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
The archived deduction in reliability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
9 / 12
75%
Performance & Context
The legacy audit deducted points for mindmap in performance context.
7 / 8
88%
Agent Usability
A modest deduction remained in agent usability for mindmap in the archived review.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
Human usability reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The archived evaluation left some headroom for mindmap under security.
11 / 12
92%
Maintainability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for mindmap under maintainability.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
The archived deduction in agent specific traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total85 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 86.2 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed

90
Canonical
You need to render mindmaps in offline, air-gapped, or internal-network environments where CDN access is unavailable
4/4 ✓
86
Variant A
You want a zero-dependency renderer using only native HTML/CSS/JS (no third-party visualization libraries)
4/4 ✓
85
Edge
Local mindmap rendering using a single HTML file: assets/local-mindmap/index.html
4/4 ✓
85
Variant B
Plain Text → node structure parsing (format and rules defined in the reference document)
4/4 ✓
85
Stress
End-to-end case for Local mindmap rendering using a single HTML file: assets/local-mindmap/index.html
4/4 ✓
90
Canonical✅ Pass
You need to render mindmaps in offline, air-gapped, or internal-network environments where CDN access is unavailable

You need to render mindmaps in offline, air-gapped, or... stayed in planning mode and returned a bounded design deliverable without relying on a runnable script.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 54/60|Total 90/100
✅A1The mindmap output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
You want a zero-dependency renderer using only native HTML/CSS/JS (no third-party visualization libraries)

The archived run treated You want a zero-dependency renderer using only native HTML/CSS/JS... as a protocol-design path rather than an executable workflow.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The mindmap output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
85
Edge✅ Pass
Local mindmap rendering using a single HTML file: assets/local-mindmap/index.html

The archived run treated Local mindmap rendering using a single HTML file:... as a protocol-design path rather than an executable workflow.

Basic 33/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 85/100
✅A1The mindmap output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
85
Variant B✅ Pass
Plain Text → node structure parsing (format and rules defined in the reference document)

This variant b case remained a study-design support path, not a code-driven execution run.

Basic 32/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 85/100
✅A1The mindmap output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
85
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Local mindmap rendering using a single HTML file: assets/local-mindmap/index.html

This stress case remained a study-design support path, not a code-driven execution run.

Basic 29/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 85/100
✅A1The mindmap output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total86.2 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Other with execution mode A
  • Static quality score is 85/100 and dynamic average is 77.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: No script verification was applicable