Evidence Insight

open-source-license-check

85100Total Score

Core Capability

88 / 100

Functional Suitability

11 / 12

Reliability

10 / 12

Performance & Context

8 / 8

Agent Usability

14 / 16

Human Usability

8 / 8

Security

10 / 12

Maintainability

10 / 12

Agent-Specific

17 / 20

Medical Task

18 / 20 Passed

90Check if referenced bioinformatics software/code licenses allow commercial use (GPL vs MIT, etc.)

4/4

86Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format

4/4

84Check if referenced bioinformatics software/code licenses allow commercial use (GPL vs MIT, etc.)

4/4

82Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py

4/4

76End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Check if referenced bioinformatics software/code licenses allow commercial use (GPL vs MIT, etc.)

2/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed

✓

Operational Stability

System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases

PASS

✓

Structural Consistency

Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format

PASS

✓

Result Determinism

Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs

PASS

✓

System Security

No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected

PASS

Research Veto✅ PASS — Applicable

Dimension	Result	Detail
Scientific Integrity	PASS	The archived audit treated this workflow as hypothesis or protocol support, not as a source of validated results.
Practice Boundaries	PASS	The legacy review kept this workflow on the evidence-access side of the boundary, not the advice-giving side.
Methodological Ground	PASS	The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Check if referenced bioinformatics software/code licenses allow commercial use (GPL vs MIT, etc.) workflow.
Code Usability	PASS	The legacy audit did not flag code-usability issues for the packaged open-source-license-check workflow.

Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability

The legacy audit deducted points for open-source-license-check in functional suitability.

11 / 12

92%

Reliability

The archived deduction in reliability traces back to: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling

10 / 12

83%

Performance & Context

Performance context reached full score in the archived evaluation.

8 / 8

100%

Agent Usability

The archived evaluation left some headroom for open-source-license-check under agent usability.

14 / 16

88%

Human Usability

No point loss was recorded for human usability in the legacy audit.

8 / 8

100%

Security

The archived evaluation left some headroom for open-source-license-check under security.

10 / 12

83%

Maintainability

The archived evaluation left some headroom for open-source-license-check under maintainability.

10 / 12

83%

Agent-Specific

The archived deduction in agent specific traces back to: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling

17 / 20

85%

Core Capability Total88 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed

Canonical

Check if referenced bioinformatics software/code licenses allow commercial use (GPL vs MIT, etc.)

4/4 ✓

Variant A

Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format

4/4 ✓

Edge

Check if referenced bioinformatics software/code licenses allow commercial use (GPL vs MIT, etc.)

4/4 ✓

Variant B

Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py

4/4 ✓

Stress

End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Check if referenced bioinformatics software/code licenses allow commercial use (GPL vs MIT, etc.)

2/4 ✓

Canonical✅ Pass

Check if referenced bioinformatics software/code licenses allow commercial use (GPL vs MIT, etc.)

The Check if referenced bioinformatics software/code licenses allow... scenario completed within the documented Check if referenced bioinformatics software/code licenses allow commercial use (GPL vs MIT,... boundary.

Basic 38/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 90/100

✅A1The open-source-license-check output structure covers required deliverable blocks

✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)

✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective

✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Variant A✅ Pass

Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format

Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.

Basic 36/40|Specialized 50/60|Total 86/100

✅A1The open-source-license-check output structure covers required deliverable blocks

✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)

✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective

✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Edge✅ Pass

Check if referenced bioinformatics software/code licenses allow commercial use (GPL vs MIT, etc.)

The archived run for Check if referenced bioinformatics software/code licenses allow... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.

Basic 35/40|Specialized 49/60|Total 84/100

✅A1The open-source-license-check output structure covers required deliverable blocks

✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)

✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective

✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Variant B✅ Pass

Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py

Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.

Basic 34/40|Specialized 48/60|Total 82/100

✅A1The open-source-license-check output structure covers required deliverable blocks

✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)

✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective

✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims

Pass rate: 4 / 4

Stress✅ Pass

End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Check if referenced bioinformatics software/code licenses allow commercial use (GPL vs MIT, etc.)

The preserved weakness for End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Check if referenced bioinformatics software/code licenses allow commercial use (GPL vs MIT, etc.) was concentrated in one point: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.

Basic 31/40|Specialized 45/60|Total 76/100

✅A1The open-source-license-check output structure covers required deliverable blocks

✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)

❌A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective

❌A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims

Pass rate: 2 / 4

Medical Task Total83.6 / 100

Key Strengths

Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review