pathml
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific integrity held because extraction and analysis outputs stayed tied to provided text, metadata, or runtime evidence rather than invented study findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The evaluated outputs stayed inside the A full-featured computational pathology toolkit for advanced WSI analysis, including... and did not drift into unsupported interpretation beyond the available inputs. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The workflow stayed grounded in its declared rubric or scale-selection logic rather than improvised criteria. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The archived review found the packaged execution path for pathml usable in its intended context. |
Core Capability84 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 86.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
This canonical case stayed focused on extracting and normalizing evidence from the provided records instead of drifting into unsupported interpretation.
This variant a case stayed focused on extracting and normalizing evidence from the provided records instead of drifting into unsupported interpretation.
This edge case stayed focused on extracting and normalizing evidence from the provided records instead of drifting into unsupported interpretation.
The archived run treated Documentation-first workflow with no packaged script requirement as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.
This stress case stayed focused on extracting and normalizing evidence from the provided records instead of drifting into unsupported interpretation.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode A
- Static quality score is 84/100 and dynamic average is 78.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: No script verification was applicable