pathway-introduction-expert
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived audit treated this workflow as hypothesis or protocol support, not as a source of validated results. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The legacy review kept this workflow on the evidence-access side of the boundary, not the advice-giving side. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | No methodological-grounding issue was recorded for pathway-introduction-expert in the archived evaluation. |
| Code Usability | PASS | No code-usability failure was preserved for pathway-introduction-expert in the legacy evaluation. |
Core Capability83 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 96 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
The Generates comprehensive academic introductions for biological... path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.
The archived run for Generates comprehensive academic introductions for biological... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
For Generates comprehensive academic introductions for biological..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
The archived run for Packaged executable path(s): scripts/validate_skill.py confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
The archived run for Generates comprehensive academic introductions for biological pathways, including signaling... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/1; adjustment=5. validate_skill.py: OK