Data Analysis
rct-bias-assessment-rob2
88100Total Score
Core Capability
83 / 100
Functional Suitability
10 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
13 / 16
Human Usability
7 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
96Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against specific domains and synthesizing a report. Use when you need to assess the quality of a clinical trial paper or evaluate risk of bias
4/4
92Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against specific domains and synthesizing a report. Use when you need to assess the quality of a clinical trial paper or evaluate risk of bias
4/4
90Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against specific domains and synthesizing a report
4/4
90Packaged executable path(s): scripts/assess_rob2.py plus 1 additional script(s)
4/4
90End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against specific domains and synthesizing a report. Use when you need to assess the quality of a clinical trial paper or evaluate risk of bias
4/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | No scientific-integrity problem was surfaced because the package did not claim more than the available records, article text, or script evidence supported. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package remained focused on Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against... rather than overclaiming what the records supported. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The workflow stayed grounded in its declared rubric or scale-selection logic rather than improvised criteria. |
| Code Usability | PASS | No code-usability failure was preserved for rct-bias-assessment-rob2 in the legacy evaluation. |
Core Capability83 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
The archived deduction in functional suitability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Reliability
The archived deduction in reliability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
Performance context reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The archived review left some headroom in how quickly an agent can lock onto the intended analysis path.
13 / 16
81%
Human Usability
The archived score suggests the output contract could be a little easier for users to inspect or reuse.
7 / 8
88%
Security
A modest security gap remained in the archived evaluation despite otherwise controlled workflow behavior.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
Maintainability stayed solid, with only limited room to simplify scripts, dependencies, or packaging structure.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
Related legacy finding for rct-bias-assessment-rob2: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total83 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 91.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
96
Canonical
Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against specific domains and synthesizing a report. Use when you need to assess the quality of a clinical trial paper or evaluate risk of bias
4/4 ✓
92
Variant A
Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against specific domains and synthesizing a report. Use when you need to assess the quality of a clinical trial paper or evaluate risk of bias
4/4 ✓
90
Edge
Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against specific domains and synthesizing a report
4/4 ✓
90
Variant B
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/assess_rob2.py plus 1 additional script(s)
4/4 ✓
90
Stress
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against specific domains and synthesizing a report. Use when you need to assess the quality of a clinical trial paper or evaluate risk of bias
4/4 ✓
96
Canonical✅ Pass
Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against specific domains and synthesizing a report. Use when you need to assess the quality of a clinical trial paper or evaluate risk of bias
This canonical case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.
Basic 36/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 96/100
✅A1The rct-bias-assessment-rob2 output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
92
Variant A✅ Pass
Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against specific domains and synthesizing a report. Use when you need to assess the quality of a clinical trial paper or evaluate risk of bias
The archived run treated Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by... as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 58/60|Total 92/100
✅A1The rct-bias-assessment-rob2 output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
90
Edge✅ Pass
Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against specific domains and synthesizing a report
Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by... remained tied to the documented analysis contract even when the preserved evidence centered on instructions instead of a full rerun.
Basic 33/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 90/100
✅A1The rct-bias-assessment-rob2 output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
90
Variant B✅ Pass
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/assess_rob2.py plus 1 additional script(s)
This variant b case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.
Basic 32/40|Specialized 58/60|Total 90/100
✅A1The rct-bias-assessment-rob2 output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
90
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against specific domains and synthesizing a report. Use when you need to assess the quality of a clinical trial paper or evaluate risk of bias
The archived run treated Automates Risk of Bias 2 (ROB2) assessment for RCT papers by analyzing text against... as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.
Basic 29/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 90/100
✅A1The rct-bias-assessment-rob2 output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total91.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 78.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 2/2; adjustment=5. assess_rob2.py: OK; extract_pdf.py: OK