reference-search
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific content remained anchored to fetched metadata or source-linked evidence in the legacy review. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The older review treated the package logic as methodologically aligned with its stated workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The packaged retrieval surface remained understandable at the command and parameter level in the archived review. |
Core Capability84 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 96 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
The archived evaluation treated Multi-database literature search and search-strategy design that... as a clean in-scope run.
The Multi-database literature search and search-strategy design that... scenario completed within the documented Multi-database literature search and search-strategy design that outputs structured,... boundary.
The Multi-database literature search and search-strategy design that... scenario completed within the documented Multi-database literature search and search-strategy design that outputs structured,... boundary.
The archived evaluation treated Packaged executable path(s): scripts/pubmed_search.py as a clean in-scope run.
The archived evaluation treated Multi-database literature search and search-strategy design that outputs structured,... as a clean in-scope run.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 84/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/1; adjustment=5. pubmed_search.py: OK