reference-style-sync
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The legacy review did not flag invented scientific claims in the package's writing-oriented output. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The evaluated outputs stayed inside the One-click synchronization and standardization of reference formats in literature management... workflow rather than drifting into unsupported scientific interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the One-click synchronization and standardization of reference formats in literature management tools, intelligently fixing metadata errors workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | No code-usability failure was preserved for reference-style-sync in the legacy evaluation. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
The One-click synchronization and standardization of reference formats... scenario completed within the documented One-click synchronization and standardization of reference formats in literature management... boundary.
The Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented One-click synchronization and standardization of reference formats in literature management... boundary.
The archived run for One-click synchronization and standardization of reference formats... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
The Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py scenario completed within the documented One-click synchronization and standardization of reference formats in literature management... boundary.
The preserved weakness for End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: One-click synchronization and standardization of reference formats in literature management tools, intelligently fixing metadata errors was concentrated in one point: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review