residency-interview-prep
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The legacy review did not flag invented scientific claims in the package's writing-oriented output. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The evaluated outputs stayed inside the Mock interview preparation tool for residency Match interviews. Generates workflow rather than drifting into unsupported scientific interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Mock interview preparation tool for residency Match interviews. Generates workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | No code-usability failure was preserved for residency-interview-prep in the legacy evaluation. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
The archived evaluation treated Mock interview preparation tool for residency Match interviews.... as a clean in-scope run.
Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The Mock interview preparation tool for residency Match interviews.... scenario completed within the documented Mock interview preparation tool for residency Match interviews. Generates boundary.
The archived evaluation treated Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py as a clean in-scope run.
The preserved weakness for End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Mock interview preparation tool for residency Match interviews. Generates was concentrated in one point: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review