scrna-cell-type-annotator
Auto-annotate cell clusters from single-cell RNA data using marker genes.
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived review kept this workflow anchored to supplied data fields and observable execution behavior, not fabricated results. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The evaluated outputs stayed inside the Auto-annotate cell clusters from single-cell RNA data using marker genes and did not drift into unsupported interpretation beyond the available inputs. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The archived evaluation treated the workflow as method-linked rather than ad hoc. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The archived review preserved a usable code path with named scripts, expected inputs, and a recognizable output contract. |
Core Capability83 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 87.2 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
Auto-annotate cell clusters from single-cell RNA data using marker genes remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
Use this skill for data analysis tasks that require explicit... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The Auto-annotate cell clusters from single-cell RNA data using marker genes path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.
The Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py scenario completed within the documented Auto-annotate cell clusters from single-cell RNA data using marker genes boundary.
The preserved weakness for End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Auto-annotate cell clusters from single-cell RNA data using marker genes was concentrated in one point: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 87.2/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review