Academic Writing
semantic-consistency-auditor
85100Total Score
Core Capability
88 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
18 / 20 Passed
90Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
4/4
86Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
4/4
84Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
4/4
82Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
4/4
76End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
2/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The legacy review did not flag invented scientific claims in the package's writing-oriented output. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The archived review kept this package within Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows that need structured..., not result fabrication or expert advice. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | No methodological-grounding issue was recorded for semantic-consistency-auditor in the archived evaluation. |
| Code Usability | N/A | The audited output is a narrative or formatting deliverable rather than a code-first scientific workflow. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
The archived review left a small gap in how directly Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows that need structured... resolves into a polished dissemination deliverable.
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
The archived deduction in reliability traces back to: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
No point loss was recorded for performance context in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The package guides agents reasonably well, while still leaving a little room for crisper trigger wording.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
Human usability reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The workflow stayed safe overall, with only a small remaining deduction around boundary signaling.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
The workflow is low-risk to maintain, though a little more structural cleanup would likely close the remaining gap.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
Agent specific was softened by the legacy issue 'Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior'. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total88 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
90
Canonical
Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
4/4 ✓
86
Variant A
Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
4/4 ✓
84
Edge
Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
4/4 ✓
82
Variant B
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
4/4 ✓
76
Stress
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
2/4 ✓
90
Canonical✅ Pass
Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
The Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows... scenario completed within the documented Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows that need structured... boundary.
Basic 38/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 90/100
✅A1The semantic-consistency-auditor output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
The Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows that need structured... boundary.
Basic 36/40|Specialized 50/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The semantic-consistency-auditor output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
84
Edge✅ Pass
Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
The archived run for Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
Basic 35/40|Specialized 49/60|Total 84/100
✅A1The semantic-consistency-auditor output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
82
Variant B✅ Pass
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 48/60|Total 82/100
✅A1The semantic-consistency-auditor output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
76
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Use semantic consistency auditor for academic writing workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries
This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Basic 31/40|Specialized 45/60|Total 76/100
✅A1The semantic-consistency-auditor output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
❌A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
❌A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 2 / 4
Medical Task Total83.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review