statistical-analysis-advisor
Recommends appropriate statistical methods (T-test vs ANOVA, etc.) based.
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | No scientific-integrity problem was surfaced because the package did not claim more than the available records, article text, or script evidence supported. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The archived review kept this package within Recommends appropriate statistical methods (T-test vs ANOVA, etc.) based, not freeform inference detached from source data. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | Methodological grounding was preserved through the documented inputs, transformations, and expected artifacts. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The archived review preserved a usable code path with named scripts, expected inputs, and a recognizable output contract. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 89.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
Recommends appropriate statistical methods (T-test vs ANOVA, etc.) based remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
Use this skill for data analysis tasks that require explicit... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The Recommends appropriate statistical methods (T-test vs ANOVA, etc.) based scenario completed within the documented Recommends appropriate statistical methods (T-test vs ANOVA, etc.) based boundary.
The archived evaluation treated Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py as a clean in-scope run.
This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 89.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review