string-database
Access the STRING database to map identifiers, retrieve protein–protein interaction networks, and run functional/PPI enrichment when you need interaction context for a gene/protein set.
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived evaluation kept the skill tied to retrieved records or indexed source material rather than invented scientific claims. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Access the STRING database to map identifiers, retrieve protein–protein interaction networks, and run functional/PPI enrichment when you need interaction context for a gene/protein set workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The packaged retrieval surface remained understandable at the command and parameter level in the archived review. |
Core Capability82 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 91.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
You have gene symbols (e.g., TP53) and need to resolve them to... was evaluated as a bounded documentation path, not as a runnable script workflow.
The archived run for You want to retrieve a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network... remained guidance-driven rather than command-driven.
ID Mapping: Convert gene/protein names to STRING identifiers for a... was evaluated as a bounded documentation path, not as a runnable script workflow.
Network Retrieval: Fetch interaction edges with confidence scores... was evaluated as a bounded documentation path, not as a runnable script workflow.
End-to-end case for ID Mapping: Convert gene/protein names to... was evaluated as a bounded documentation path, not as a runnable script workflow.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 82/100 and dynamic average is 78.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 2/2; adjustment=5. string_api.py: OK; __init__.py: OK