survival-analysis-km
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived review kept this workflow anchored to supplied data fields and observable execution behavior, not fabricated results. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The evaluated outputs stayed inside the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis tool for clinical and biological research. Generates... and did not drift into unsupported interpretation beyond the available inputs. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The archived evaluation treated the workflow as method-linked rather than ad hoc. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The archived review preserved a usable code path with named scripts, expected inputs, and a recognizable output contract. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 89.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis tool for clinical and biological... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The Use this skill for data analysis tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented Kaplan-Meier survival analysis tool for clinical and biological research. Generates... boundary.
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis tool for clinical and biological... scenario completed within the documented Kaplan-Meier survival analysis tool for clinical and biological research. Generates... boundary.
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 89.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review