Evidence Insight
systematic-review-screener
85100Total Score
Core Capability
88 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
18 / 20 Passed
90Automated abstract screening tool for systematic literature reviews with PRISMA workflow support
4/4
86Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
4/4
84Automated abstract screening tool for systematic literature reviews with PRISMA workflow support
4/4
82Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
4/4
76End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Automated abstract screening tool for systematic literature reviews with PRISMA workflow support
2/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived audit treated this workflow as hypothesis or protocol support, not as a source of validated results. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The package stayed in retrieval, extraction, or evidence-organization scope rather than drifting into unsupported interpretation. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Automated abstract screening tool for systematic literature reviews with PRISMA workflow support workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The archived review found the packaged execution path for systematic-review-screener usable in its intended context. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for systematic-review-screener under functional suitability.
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Related legacy finding for systematic-review-screener: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
Performance context reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for systematic-review-screener under agent usability.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
Human usability reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Security
A modest deduction remained in security for systematic-review-screener in the archived review.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
A modest deduction remained in maintainability for systematic-review-screener in the archived review.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
The archived deduction in agent specific traces back to: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total88 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
90
Canonical
Automated abstract screening tool for systematic literature reviews with PRISMA workflow support
4/4 ✓
86
Variant A
Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
4/4 ✓
84
Edge
Automated abstract screening tool for systematic literature reviews with PRISMA workflow support
4/4 ✓
82
Variant B
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
4/4 ✓
76
Stress
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Automated abstract screening tool for systematic literature reviews with PRISMA workflow support
2/4 ✓
90
Canonical✅ Pass
Automated abstract screening tool for systematic literature reviews with PRISMA workflow support
Automated abstract screening tool for systematic literature reviews... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
Basic 38/40|Specialized 52/60|Total 90/100
✅A1The systematic-review-screener output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit assumptions, bounded scope, and a reproducible output format
Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
Basic 36/40|Specialized 50/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The systematic-review-screener output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
84
Edge✅ Pass
Automated abstract screening tool for systematic literature reviews with PRISMA workflow support
The Automated abstract screening tool for systematic literature reviews... path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.
Basic 35/40|Specialized 49/60|Total 84/100
✅A1The systematic-review-screener output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
82
Variant B✅ Pass
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
Basic 34/40|Specialized 48/60|Total 82/100
✅A1The systematic-review-screener output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
✅A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
✅A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 4 / 4
76
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Automated abstract screening tool for systematic literature reviews with PRISMA workflow support
The Automated abstract screening tool for systematic literature reviews with PRISMA workflow support path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.
Basic 31/40|Specialized 45/60|Total 76/100
✅A1The systematic-review-screener output structure covers required deliverable blocks
✅A2Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0)
❌A3The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective
❌A4Required research safety/boundary guidance is present without overclaims
Pass rate: 2 / 4
Medical Task Total83.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review