translational-gap-analyzer
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The legacy review kept outputs in proposal or planning mode rather than presenting them as completed experimental findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The legacy review kept this workflow on the evidence-access side of the boundary, not the advice-giving side. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Assess translational gaps between preclinical models and human diseases workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The archived review found the packaged execution path for translational-gap-analyzer usable in its intended context. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
Assess translational gaps between preclinical models and human diseases remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The Use this skill for evidence insight tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented Assess translational gaps between preclinical models and human diseases boundary.
The Assess translational gaps between preclinical models and human diseases path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Evidence Insight with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review