Other

treatment-plans

87100Total Score
Core Capability
88 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
15 / 20 Passed
86Generate concise (typically 1–4 pages) patient-centered medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF when a clinician needs an actionable plan with SMART goals, evidence-based interventions, monitoring, and HIPAA-aware documentation
3/4
86Generate concise (typically 1–4 pages) patient-centered medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF when a clinician needs an actionable plan with SMART goals, evidence-based interventions, monitoring, and HIPAA-aware documentation
3/4
86Concise formats by default
3/4
86Preferred: 1-page quick reference card
3/4
86End-to-end case for Concise formats by default
3/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS

Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability
Functional suitability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Related legacy finding for treatment-plans: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
Performance context reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for treatment-plans under agent usability.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
Human usability reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The archived evaluation left some headroom for treatment-plans under security.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
A modest deduction remained in maintainability for treatment-plans in the archived review.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
Related legacy finding for treatment-plans: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total88 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 86 / 100 — Assertions: 15/20 Passed

86
Canonical
Generate concise (typically 1–4 pages) patient-centered medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF when a clinician needs an actionable plan with SMART goals, evidence-based interventions, monitoring, and HIPAA-aware documentation
3/4 ✓
86
Variant A
Generate concise (typically 1–4 pages) patient-centered medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF when a clinician needs an actionable plan with SMART goals, evidence-based interventions, monitoring, and HIPAA-aware documentation
3/4 ✓
86
Edge
Concise formats by default
3/4 ✓
86
Variant B
Preferred: 1-page quick reference card
3/4 ✓
86
Stress
End-to-end case for Concise formats by default
3/4 ✓
86
Canonical✅ Pass
Generate concise (typically 1–4 pages) patient-centered medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF when a clinician needs an actionable plan with SMART goals, evidence-based interventions, monitoring, and HIPAA-aware documentation

This canonical case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 33/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The treatment-plans output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
Generate concise (typically 1–4 pages) patient-centered medical treatment plans in LaTeX/PDF when a clinician needs an actionable plan with SMART goals, evidence-based interventions, monitoring, and HIPAA-aware documentation

The main issue in this variant a run was: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 31/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The treatment-plans output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Edge✅ Pass
Concise formats by default

The main issue in this edge run was: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 30/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The treatment-plans output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Variant B✅ Pass
Preferred: 1-page quick reference card

This variant b case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 29/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The treatment-plans output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Concise formats by default

The main issue in this stress run was: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 26/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The treatment-plans output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
Medical Task Total86 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Other with execution mode B
  • Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 71.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: Script verification 4/4; adjustment=5. check_completeness.py: OK; generate_template.py: OK; timeline_generator.py: OK; validate_treatment_plan.py: OK