volcano-plot-script
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived review kept this workflow anchored to supplied data fields and observable execution behavior, not fabricated results. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package remained focused on Generate R/Python code for volcano plots from DEG (Differentially Expressed Genes) analysis... rather than overclaiming what the records supported. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The archived evaluation treated the workflow as method-linked rather than ad hoc. |
| Code Usability | PASS | Code usability passed because the package still exposed a reviewable execution surface for its documented workflow. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 84.4 / 100 — Assertions: 17/20 Passed
The Generate R/Python code for volcano plots from DEG (Differentially... scenario completed within the documented Generate R/Python code for volcano plots from DEG (Differentially Expressed Genes) analysis... boundary.
The Use this skill for data analysis tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented Generate R/Python code for volcano plots from DEG (Differentially Expressed Genes) analysis... boundary.
The Generate R/Python code for volcano plots from DEG (Differentially... path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.
This variant b case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: Script execution path is available (command exit code is 0).
The main issue in this stress run was: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 84.4/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review