academic-abstract-refiner
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived evaluation preserved source-faithful writing behavior without adding unsupported results or conclusions. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The archived review kept this package within Refines long medical academic texts into SCI-style unstructured Chinese and English abstracts, not result fabrication or expert advice. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Refines long medical academic texts into SCI-style unstructured Chinese and English abstracts workflow. |
| Code Usability | N/A | This package is judged mainly on writing behavior, so code usability is not a central evaluation target here. |
Core Capability83 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 96 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
For Converting a long medical review draft into a concise, SCI-style..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
For Summarizing experimental or clinical study reports into bilingual..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
The Generates unstructured (single-paragraph) abstracts in Chinese and... path verified the packaged helper command without exposing a deeper execution issue.
For Enforces an academic, formal tone aligned with SCI journal abstract..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
For End-to-end case for Generates unstructured (single-paragraph)..., the preserved evidence is lightweight but positive: the packaged validation command behaved as expected.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 83/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 2/2; adjustment=5. refine_abstract.py: OK; validate_skill.py: OK