Other

bib-formatter

87100Total Score
Core Capability
88 / 100
Functional Suitability
11 / 12
Reliability
10 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
14 / 16
Human Usability
8 / 8
Security
10 / 12
Maintainability
10 / 12
Agent-Specific
17 / 20
Medical Task
15 / 20 Passed
86You have a bibliography in RIS/BibTeX/plain text/CSL-JSON and must reformat it to a journal style (e.g., NEJM, The Lancet, Nature) before submission
3/4
86You need to switch in-text citation formatting (e.g., generating formatted citations for specific cite keys/IDs)
3/4
86Supports input formats: RIS, BibTeX, plain text, CSL-JSON
3/4
86Outputs bibliography entries compatible with CSL styles (including NEJM/Lancet/Nature or any custom .csl)
3/4
86End-to-end case for Supports input formats: RIS, BibTeX, plain text, CSL-JSON
3/4

Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration

Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS
✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS
✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS
✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASS

Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories

Functional Suitability
The archived deduction in functional suitability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
11 / 12
92%
Reliability
Reliability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Performance & Context
No point loss was recorded for performance context in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for bib-formatter under agent usability.
14 / 16
88%
Human Usability
No point loss was recorded for human usability in the legacy audit.
8 / 8
100%
Security
The legacy audit deducted points for bib-formatter in security.
10 / 12
83%
Maintainability
The archived evaluation left some headroom for bib-formatter under maintainability.
10 / 12
83%
Agent-Specific
Related legacy finding for bib-formatter: Stabilize executable path and fallback behavior. Some inputs only reached PARTIAL due to execution gaps or weak boundary handling
17 / 20
85%
Core Capability Total88 / 100

Medical TaskExecution Average: 86 / 100 — Assertions: 15/20 Passed

86
Canonical
You have a bibliography in RIS/BibTeX/plain text/CSL-JSON and must reformat it to a journal style (e.g., NEJM, The Lancet, Nature) before submission
3/4 ✓
86
Variant A
You need to switch in-text citation formatting (e.g., generating formatted citations for specific cite keys/IDs)
3/4 ✓
86
Edge
Supports input formats: RIS, BibTeX, plain text, CSL-JSON
3/4 ✓
86
Variant B
Outputs bibliography entries compatible with CSL styles (including NEJM/Lancet/Nature or any custom .csl)
3/4 ✓
86
Stress
End-to-end case for Supports input formats: RIS, BibTeX, plain text, CSL-JSON
3/4 ✓
86
Canonical✅ Pass
You have a bibliography in RIS/BibTeX/plain text/CSL-JSON and must reformat it to a journal style (e.g., NEJM, The Lancet, Nature) before submission

This canonical case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 33/40|Specialized 53/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The bib-formatter output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Variant A✅ Pass
You need to switch in-text citation formatting (e.g., generating formatted citations for specific cite keys/IDs)

The main issue in this variant a run was: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 31/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The bib-formatter output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Edge✅ Pass
Supports input formats: RIS, BibTeX, plain text, CSL-JSON

The preserved weakness for Supports input formats: RIS, BibTeX, plain text, CSL-JSON was concentrated in one point: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 30/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The bib-formatter output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Variant B✅ Pass
Outputs bibliography entries compatible with CSL styles (including NEJM/Lancet/Nature or any custom .csl)

This variant b case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 29/40|Specialized 57/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The bib-formatter output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
86
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Supports input formats: RIS, BibTeX, plain text, CSL-JSON

This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case.

Basic 26/40|Specialized 60/60|Total 86/100
✅A1The bib-formatter output structure matches the documented deliverable
❌A2The script execution path completed successfully for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 3 / 4
Medical Task Total86 / 100

Key Strengths

  • Primary routing is Other with execution mode B
  • Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 71.6/100
  • Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
  • Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/1; adjustment=5. format_bibliography.py: OK