Data Analysis
diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2
Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2").
86100Total Score
Core Capability
81 / 100
Functional Suitability
10 / 12
Reliability
9 / 12
Performance & Context
8 / 8
Agent Usability
13 / 16
Human Usability
7 / 8
Security
9 / 12
Maintainability
9 / 12
Agent-Specific
16 / 20
Medical Task
20 / 20 Passed
93Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2")
4/4
89Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2")
4/4
87Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool
4/4
87Packaged executable path(s): scripts/pdf_extractor.py plus 1 additional script(s)
4/4
87End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2")
4/4
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
Skill Veto✓ All 4 gates passed
✓
Operational Stability
System remains stable across varied inputs and edge cases
PASS✓
Structural Consistency
Output structure conforms to expected skill contract format
PASS✓
Result Determinism
Equivalent inputs produce semantically equivalent outputs
PASS✓
System Security
No prompt injection, data leakage, or unsafe tool use detected
PASSResearch Veto✅ PASS — Applicable
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | Scientific integrity held because extraction and analysis outputs stayed tied to provided text, metadata, or runtime evidence rather than invented study findings. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | The archived review kept this package within Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool, not freeform inference detached from source data. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | Methodological grounding held because the package kept its judgments tied to explicit rubric logic. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy audit did not flag code-usability issues for the packaged diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2 workflow. |
Core Capability81 / 100 — 8 Categories
Functional Suitability
Functional suitability was softened by the legacy issue 'Improve stress-case output rigor'. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
10 / 12
83%
Reliability
The archived deduction in reliability traces back to: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
9 / 12
75%
Performance & Context
Performance context reached full score in the archived evaluation.
8 / 8
100%
Agent Usability
The packaged analysis path is understandable, though the archived score suggests slightly clearer routing would help.
13 / 16
81%
Human Usability
The package is readable overall, though the archived review still left a small human-usability gap.
7 / 8
88%
Security
The packaged workflow stayed safe overall, with only a small remaining deduction around boundary signaling.
9 / 12
75%
Maintainability
The archived review treated the package as maintainable, while still preserving some room for cleanup.
9 / 12
75%
Agent-Specific
Related legacy finding for diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2: Improve stress-case output rigor. Stress and boundary scenarios show weaker consistency
16 / 20
80%
Core Capability Total81 / 100
Medical TaskExecution Average: 88.6 / 100 — Assertions: 20/20 Passed
93
Canonical
Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2")
4/4 ✓
89
Variant A
Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2")
4/4 ✓
87
Edge
Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool
4/4 ✓
87
Variant B
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/pdf_extractor.py plus 1 additional script(s)
4/4 ✓
87
Stress
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2")
4/4 ✓
93
Canonical✅ Pass
Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2")
The archived run treated Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the... as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.
Basic 35/40|Specialized 58/60|Total 93/100
✅A1The diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2 output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
89
Variant A✅ Pass
Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2")
This variant a case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.
Basic 33/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 89/100
✅A1The diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2 output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
87
Edge✅ Pass
Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool
This edge case stayed within the packaged analysis boundary and kept a reviewable task contract.
Basic 32/40|Specialized 55/60|Total 87/100
✅A1The diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2 output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
87
Variant B✅ Pass
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/pdf_extractor.py plus 1 additional script(s)
Packaged executable path(s): scripts/pdf_extractor.py plus 1... remained an analysis-style extraction path whose value came from structured data capture rather than a freeform narrative response.
Basic 31/40|Specialized 56/60|Total 87/100
✅A1The diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2 output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
87
Stress✅ Pass
End-to-end case for Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Use when Claude needs to assess the quality, risk of bias, or applicability of diagnostic accuracy studies (e.g., "Assess this paper using QUADAS-2")
The archived run treated Analyzes clinical diagnostic accuracy studies for bias using the QUADAS-2 tool as a bounded analysis workflow rather than a purely narrative instruction path.
Basic 28/40|Specialized 59/60|Total 87/100
✅A1The diagnostic-study-quality-assessment-quadas-2 output structure matches the documented deliverable
✅A2The instruction path remains actionable for the documented case
✅A3The output stays fully within the documented skill boundary
✅A4The response quality is acceptable for the documented path
Pass rate: 4 / 4
Medical Task Total88.6 / 100
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Data Analysis with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 81/100 and dynamic average is 77.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review
- Execution verification summary: Script verification 1/2; adjustment=3. pdf_extractor.py: rc=1; quadas_assessment.py: OK