ectd-xml-compiler
Veto GatesRequired pass for any deployment consideration
| Dimension | Result | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific Integrity | PASS | The archived evaluation preserved source-faithful writing behavior without adding unsupported results or conclusions. |
| Practice Boundaries | PASS | Practice boundaries held because the package kept to Automatically convert uploaded drug application documents (Word/PDF) into XML skeleton... instead of claiming new evidence. |
| Methodological Ground | PASS | The legacy audit preserved a method-grounded interpretation of the Automatically convert uploaded drug application documents (Word/PDF) into XML skeleton structure compliant with eCTD 4.0/3.2.2 specifications workflow. |
| Code Usability | PASS | The legacy audit did not flag code-usability issues for the packaged ectd-xml-compiler workflow. |
Core Capability88 / 100 — 8 Categories
Medical TaskExecution Average: 83.6 / 100 — Assertions: 18/20 Passed
Automatically convert uploaded drug application documents... remained well-aligned with the documented contract in the preserved audit.
The Use this skill for academic writing tasks that require explicit... scenario completed within the documented Automatically convert uploaded drug application documents (Word/PDF) into XML skeleton... boundary.
The archived run for Automatically convert uploaded drug application documents... confirmed the helper entrypoint and left the workflow in a stable state.
The archived evaluation treated Packaged executable path(s): scripts/main.py as a clean in-scope run.
This stress case was mostly intact, but the archived review centered its concern on: The output stays within declared skill scope and target objective.
Key Strengths
- Primary routing is Academic Writing with execution mode B
- Static quality score is 88/100 and dynamic average is 83.6/100
- Assertions and command execution outcomes are recorded per input for human review